Monday, January 15, 2018

Re: [IAC#RG] Is there a difference between Kejriwal and a common prostitute ?

You are right.

The electoral rout of BJP in rural Gujarat, coupled with public awareness of massive systematic corruption in BJP ruled states has caused the forces of fascist communalism to reappraise their strategies when the farmers and workers of Gujarat and India are greatly agitated by the corrupt policies of baniya dominated parties like BJP and AAP.

That the Illuminati backed BJP is reviving the baniya fakeGandhi Anna Hazare, to be surrounded by a new pack of eminent foreign controlled people like Kailash Satyarthi, Kapil Mishra, Kumar Vishwaas et al in calling for Lokpal Act exposes how they are not leaving anything to chance for 2019.

Hazare will be just a media sideshow to distract from real issues of BJP's corruption, farmer angst and suicides, and complete breakdown of law and order under BJP misrule, and wonders why Hazare was silent for 3 years and only springs up like a mechanical toy before elections.

JBM

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Rajinder Dalvi <rajinder.dalvi@gmail.com> wrote:
There can be no doubt whatsoever that a certain Indian community is behind all the scams which have come to light in the 70 years of "India". There can be none so blind as those who will not admit it.

Coming back to the question of why these 2Gs were nominated to Rajya Sabha by Kejriwal, it would be prudent to recall what happened in AAP at the time of seat distribution for the 7 Lok Sabha seats of Delhi - all of which AAP lost in 2014.

By making a great show of transparency, the AAP had then called for public self-nominations for all those 7 seats, for which 11,387 valid self nominations were received (each required to be recommended by1,000 local AAP members). At the end of it all 7 tickets for these LS seats were given to people like Rajmohan Gandhi and Ashutosh who did not even file applications and could not even muster up 50 members each. Who was behind this ? Of course the Congress through their moles in AAP like Yogendra "Salim Khan" Yadav. Can we forget that Yogendra Yadav was in NAC, on so many UGC committees under Kapil Sibal and was even the personal home tutor of Rahul Gandhi selected by Digvijay Singh ? The Swaraj India party was a desperate Congress backed party to split some AAP votes

In the present case of 2Gs, it was predecided that these 2 seats would be sold to the Congress banias parachuted into AAP  by Ashish Talwar. To cover this up, a great mock camouflage show was made of asking "eminent" people like Raghuram Rajan and Munjal to take up these seats when these had already been sold to the Congress. However now at least 2 of those eminent people have denied they were ever approached by AAP saying these were planted stories by AAP's media machine.

It is clear that AAP is a corrupt party waiting to implode. Already all the RSS/BJP inclined rats like Kapil Mishra and Kumar Vishwas are leaving this sinking ship and hoping to get onto another BJP sponsored Anna Hazare Lokpal vessel scheduled to sail on March 23. Anna has been booked from 15th March to cause caste-war for Kejriwal inside AAP by the RSS elements since Delhi's citizens are aggrieved with both AAP and BJP and otherwise Congress stands to return in Delhi.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Gaur J K <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

8/1/18


The fact remains that caste considerations and parochial sentiments are becoming more pronounced otherwise there was no need for the PM to invoke these issues repeatedly during Gujrat election.

Likwise when we talk about corruption the two main culprits are politicians in cohorts with babus as beneficiaries and the business class including industrialists who give bribes to politicians for a consideration.

Obviously it becomes evident that a certain caste/community  are controlling business and industry  not now but even during cononial rule. It will reveal the pattern or predominance of that community/class from all scams that have come to light during the last 70 years. The issue under discussion is which community Kejriwal comes from and what were the considerations which promted him to name two novices for Rajya Sabha Seats from the same community. Regds 





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Is there a difference between Kejriwal and a common prostitute ?

Such remarks show how little you know of real India or Hinduism.

What is called 'Socialism' in the West is very much an indigeneous concept and virtually Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family) which is a Brahmanical concept directed for lower castes in the MahaUpanishad

The world is a family

One is a relative, the other stranger,
say the small minded.
The entire world is a family,
live the magnanimous.

Be detached,
be magnanimous,
lift up your mind, enjoy
the fruit of Brahmanic freedom.


On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Supratim Basu <xsupratim@gmail.com> wrote:
For all those espousing socialism, and thinking that this is the "Indian" way, do remember that the entire battle of Mahabharata was about property rights, and individual rights and individual honour and respect. Not collectivism and "common rights" (if such a thing could ever exist). If I were to really, really distill the central message of Gita, it is about how each individual *must* act, according to his own integrity and ability, and the impact that has on the commons/society - not about how societal or common norms must be adhered to or is supreme or that the individual must bow down to the collective. It is ALL about individual action and responsibility for that action.

Bharatvarsha/India was never a collectivist society - unfortunately, we have forgotten both our itihaas and our smriti.  And, embraced an evil, insidious foreign ideology called Socialism - if there is a conspiracy theory, it is this - the English injected socialism in our veins, so that India could never compete on the global stage.

Do think about it.

On 7 January 2018 at 12:26, Supratim Basu <xsupratim@gmail.com> wrote:
So, the IAC and/or the HRA are  not only Socialist but pure casteist organisations?

Everything is to be seen through the lenses of birth-based caste ideology??? Someone is to be determined superior/inferior based on their last names? Whole communities (instead of individuals) of India are to be slandered and villified based on their birth? Not their actual work or actions? And, you call yourself a "defender" of the Hindu faith? Is that what the Shri Bhagwad tells you?

And, then, the IAC keeps on denouncing foreigners, foreign capital and foreign influence, but swears by a foreign ideology (Socialism)??? The irony of that is indeed superb. To ignore the works of Acharya Chanakya, and instead pledge one-selves to the philosophy of Marx, Engels and Keynes - how brilliant is that, oh my swadeshi folks??

And, sure, go ahead and explain to me more what bengali words mean - that should be an interesting past time. But, giving yourself the appellation of Bagha, while being a keyboard warrior and calling for genocide against our own people - that is only a sordid insult to the memory of Bagha Jatin. You can only be a "taash goru", not a real Bengali to do so.

I am done (with IACHRA, too - if they actually support your vile thought process/inclinations), you can go ahead and spout as much as you want, now.



On 6 January 2018 at 22:22, Jatin Bagha <jatin.jugantar@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes Mr. Basu

IAC is a SOCIALIST (and therefore 'collectivist') andolan of HRA.

You may not know it, but "Bagha" means big cat (like tiger or lion). The revolutionary title of "Bagha" is only given within warrior classes like Brahmins and Kshatriyas, and it is very rare for it to be given to lesser castes like Kayasthas or Baniyas.

In HRA the Bagha title is bestowed only on those of our Khalsa, ie. "pure" initiated warriors who uphold and defend our great national religion through violence. Sikhs had a similar title "Singh" (lion) but it is now overused and today even baniyas and lalas of Sikhism are calling themselves as Singhs.

HRA is always socialist and can never be communist, but probably an atheist capitalist like yourself would not know the great differences between socialism and communism.

Coming back to the topic. It is clear that AAP by its RS nominations is exposed as a "Manuwadi" party who can't accept Dalits and Brahmins. It is also clear that those Baniyas (including their foreign Baniya and overseas Jew financiers) who control AAP through brokers like Ashish Talwar are positioning AAP to concentrate the Baniya and Punjabi votebanks of Delhi, leaving the Dalit, Brahmin, Purvanchali and Muslim votebanks for the Congress and BJP to fight over.

Jai Hind

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Supratim Basu <xsupratim@gmail.com> wrote:
Unbelievable - some one paraphrasing the name of the revolutionary Bagha Jatin - spouts such vile casteist and racist hatred, leading up to threatening genocide of other Indians.

Truly, the communists (and socialists and collectivists of all hues) are the bane of any human progress or civilisation. India is doubly cursed in this regard - with its thought process corrupted by two great collectivist forces - socialism/communism and religion.

Faugh.

On 6 January 2018 at 10:49, Jatin Bagha <jatin.jugantar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ​I am unable to understand where we are heading with such shallow arguments. Those who want to do something concrete should say show their intent or provide a solution.

There was a great betrayal of the Indian people in 2010-12 by a baniya controlled conspiracy, at a turning point where there was a glorious opportunity to overturn the corrupt system and replace it with a new order.

HRA has seen the IAC has successfully adapted since then by realising that baniyas (as a class) and their political party system cannot be trusted, and are the natural class enemies of the Indian people.
Factually, almost every corruption related problem in India can be ultimately traced to baniya community and the business-neta-judiciary nexus.

There is no point asking for proof, holding vigilance enquiry, appointing committees of inquiry, or going off  to baniya controlled courts. These are all the standard devices of corruption devised by baniyas to fool the Indian people. The proof will only come out when the baniya is cowering before a Hindustani people's court and confessing his guilt in public before his victims.

If you want intent of IAC, I suspect it is anti-baniya.

If you want solution of IAC, I predict it will be the same as Hitler's final solution for the baniyas of Germany.


On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Himangshu Vaish <hrvaish@gmail.com> wrote:


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG] सेना दिवस

सेना दिवस
………………

आज़ाद हुआ था
देश का चप्पा-चप्पा,
सेना प्रमुख बने थे
आज ही करिअप्पा।

वतन के लिए आपने
लूटा दी है जवानी,
कई साथियों को पड़ी है
जान भी गवानी।

सेना के सभी शहीदों
आपको श्रद्धा सुमन,
वीर जवानों से है
हमारे चमन में अमन।

युद्ध की विभीषिका
या हो दैविक आपदा,
सब से लड़ बचाते
हमारी जान व संपदा।

हर मोर्चे पर डटे
जवानों को बधाई,
आपके सम्मान में
सेना दिवस आई ।2।

देश के सभी शहीद जवानों को श्रद्धांजलि एवं नमन।
सेना दिवस पर सभी सैनिक भाई - बहनों को हार्दिक बधाई एवं ढेर सारी शुभकामनाएँ।

Õm - Õnkār - Allāh - God…..
ॐ - ੴ - الله - † …….
Jai Hind! Jai Jagat (Universe)!

- ग़ुलाम कुन्दनम्
(Ghulam Kundanam).
15/01/2018


FB link :-
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1785389428172397&id=100001040727520&set=a.260435270667828.73436.100001040727520

On 14/01/2018, Hirak Nag <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
> One opinion by one lawyer. The very disturbing revolt by senior judges is
> playing out, the Indian Common Man needs to very carefully monitor the
> development and hope The Judges themselves compromise and come to a
> judicially acceptable settlement at the earliest in order to save our
> democracy, Cdr, Hirak Nag, an ordinary citizen.
>
> On ‎Sunday‎, ‎14‎ ‎January‎ ‎2018‎ ‎20‎:‎56‎:‎36‎ ‎IST, Aires Rodrigues
> <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The mutiny between thefour brave senior most Judges of the Supreme Court and
> the Chief Justice ofIndia was long overdue. This must act as a warning and
> an alarm to everyIndian that our very democracy is in peril.
>
>
>
>
> Justice V.R. KrishnaIyer had said "Even so, the creed
> of judicial independence isour constitutional 'religion' and, if the
> executive use Article 222 to imperilthis basic tenet, the Court must 'do or
> die'.
>
>
>
> The Constitutionof India is very clear on the distinct
> rolesof the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. It envisages afree, fair
> and independent Judiciary. The highest standards
> of judicial independence must be ensured bywarding off even the faintest
> trace of governmental influenceon the judiciary.
>
>
>
> Under Prime MinisterNarendra Modi, with the sanctity of otherpillars of our
> democracy severely dented and having gone for a toss,our only hope now
> remains on the Judiciary.
>
>
>
> With the BJPwanting to overpower the Judiciary too, there is a
> verydisturbing disquiet over the slippery slope on which judicial values
> areslithering. The highest standards of judicial independence must be
> ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmentalinfluence
> on the judiciary, which is the last hopefor thecommon man.
>
>
>
> Any direct or indirectinterference by the politicians in the selection and
> appointment of Judges is athreat to the very Independence of the
> Judiciary.If the Judiciary is reduced to a
> mouthpiece of the government, the Courts will lose allrelevance and end up
> also as dens of chicanery andjugglery. The Judiciary should never be manned
> by persons who aretilted or aligned to any political party. Judges
> shouldhave the spine to crack on illegalities done by all
> politicians,regardless of how high positions they hold. It has to be ensured
> thatjudicial accountability is maintained at all times with every Judge
> conformingto the highest standards of uprightness and integrity. IfJudges
> cannot
> independentlybalance the scales of Justice, the Temples of Justicebecome
> pointless.
>
>
>
> Caroline Kennedy hadalso very rightly said "The bedrock of our democracy is
> the rule of law andthat means we have to
> havean independent judiciary, judges who can makedecisions independent of
> the political winds that are blowing"
>
>
>
> To those very fewoutdated who have opined that the four Judges should not
> have gone public, may we remind them of what Lord Harry Woolf,
> aformer Chief Justice of England had said"Like old clocks,
> our judicial institutions need to be oiled, woundup and set to true time".
>
>
>
> Aires Rodrigues
>
> Advocate High Court
>
> C/G-2, Shopping Complex
>
> Ribandar Retreat,
>
> Ribandar – Goa – 403006
>
>
> Mobile No: 9822684372
>
>
> Office Tel No: (0832) 2444012
>
> Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com
>
> Or
>
> airesrodrigues@yahoo.com
>
>
> You can also reach me on
>
>
> Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues
>
>
> Twitter@rodrigues_aires
>
>
>
>
> www.airesrodrigues.com
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Re: [IAC#RG] Is there a difference between Kejriwal and a common prostitute ?

There can be no doubt whatsoever that a certain Indian community is behind all the scams which have come to light in the 70 years of "India". There can be none so blind as those who will not admit it.

Coming back to the question of why these 2Gs were nominated to Rajya Sabha by Kejriwal, it would be prudent to recall what happened in AAP at the time of seat distribution for the 7 Lok Sabha seats of Delhi - all of which AAP lost in 2014.

By making a great show of transparency, the AAP had then called for public self-nominations for all those 7 seats, for which 11,387 valid self nominations were received (each required to be recommended by1,000 local AAP members). At the end of it all 7 tickets for these LS seats were given to people like Rajmohan Gandhi and Ashutosh who did not even file applications and could not even muster up 50 members each. Who was behind this ? Of course the Congress through their moles in AAP like Yogendra "Salim Khan" Yadav. Can we forget that Yogendra Yadav was in NAC, on so many UGC committees under Kapil Sibal and was even the personal home tutor of Rahul Gandhi selected by Digvijay Singh ? The Swaraj India party was a desperate Congress backed party to split some AAP votes

In the present case of 2Gs, it was predecided that these 2 seats would be sold to the Congress banias parachuted into AAP  by Ashish Talwar. To cover this up, a great mock camouflage show was made of asking "eminent" people like Raghuram Rajan and Munjal to take up these seats when these had already been sold to the Congress. However now at least 2 of those eminent people have denied they were ever approached by AAP saying these were planted stories by AAP's media machine.

It is clear that AAP is a corrupt party waiting to implode. Already all the RSS/BJP inclined rats like Kapil Mishra and Kumar Vishwas are leaving this sinking ship and hoping to get onto another BJP sponsored Anna Hazare Lokpal vessel scheduled to sail on March 23. Anna has been booked from 15th March to cause caste-war for Kejriwal inside AAP by the RSS elements since Delhi's citizens are aggrieved with both AAP and BJP and otherwise Congress stands to return in Delhi.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Gaur J K <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

8/1/18


The fact remains that caste considerations and parochial sentiments are becoming more pronounced otherwise there was no need for the PM to invoke these issues repeatedly during Gujrat election.

Likwise when we talk about corruption the two main culprits are politicians in cohorts with babus as beneficiaries and the business class including industrialists who give bribes to politicians for a consideration.

Obviously it becomes evident that a certain caste/community  are controlling business and industry  not now but even during cononial rule. It will reveal the pattern or predominance of that community/class from all scams that have come to light during the last 70 years. The issue under discussion is which community Kejriwal comes from and what were the considerations which promted him to name two novices for Rajya Sabha Seats from the same community. Regds 




Re: [IAC#RG] JUDICIARY NEEDS TO ACT AS TRUE WATCH DOGS OF DEMOCRACY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE

This morning's report in TOI says that over the last decade the very sensitive cases have gone to junior judges. The examples they quote are pre Modi era. You being a lawyer should be aware that most SC and HC judges were 'appointed' by Congress. They chose pliable lawyers and pushed them forward. 

So going by your opening sentance, the basis for your argument appears without sound basis. Political interference cannot be the basis for discomfort amongst these judges , because interference if it exists, is no greater now than before. Most appear leaning towards Congress and Left parties. JC missed CJI position twice, so there could be unhappiness and envy here.   Where was justice for 84 riots, ethnic cleansing of Pandits during UPA? Just two examples. 

'The mutiny between the four brave senior most Judges of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India was long overdue. This must act as a warning and an alarm to every Indian that our very democracy is in peril.'  

You go on to say under Modi pillars of democracy are crumbling. Yes I agree Judiciary must remain independent and fair to citizens. Its a must for our democracy. But else has changed.  More than 30% criminals as lawmakers - all parties guilty, no change under Modi. Media controlled by business houses and any dissenting media side lined - no change from UPA.  Only noticeable change is the emergence of Hindu fringe groups. But you should be aware that if a community is kept surpresed for centuries and they suddenly see freedom, however msplaced in their belief, then such recations are to be expected. Yes indeed the law is not effective in many regions. But if you look arefully so was the case before. Difference is in the nature of media publcity. If you look at the enforcement agencies, I see no changed. CBI/ CVC remain caged parrots as before.  Police remains inefficient as before albeit I do see some improvements in stats whether this is true or false there is not independent analysis. Minority appeasement was there before and is there now. There is evidence of some relief to majority - but why not? 

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with the sanctity of other pillars of our democracy severely dented and having gone for a toss, our only hope now remains on the Judiciary.

So what is the real reson for your discomfort? 

Democracy has been increasingly under threat in India fro many years and if anything there are signs of intent to improve this situation. 


On 13 January 2018 at 05:51, Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:

The mutiny between the four brave senior most Judges of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India was long overdue. This must act as a warning and an alarm to every Indian that our very democracy is in peril.

 

Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer had said "Even so, the creed of judicial independence is our constitutional 'religion' and, if the executive use Article 222 to imperil this basic tenet, the Court must 'do or die'.

 

The Constitution of India is very clear on the distinct roles of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. It envisages a free, fair and independent Judiciary. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary.

 

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with the sanctity of other pillars of our democracy severely dented and having gone for a toss, our only hope now remains on the Judiciary.

 

With the BJP wanting to overpower the Judiciary too, there is a very disturbing disquiet over the slippery slope on which judicial values are slithering. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary, which is the last hope for thecommon man.

 

Any direct or indirect interference by the politicians in the selection and appointment of Judges is a threat to the very Independence of the Judiciary. If the Judiciary is reduced to a mouth piece of the government, the Courts will lose all relevance and end up also as dens of chicanery and jugglery. The Judiciary should never be manned by persons who are tilted or aligned to any political party. Judges should have the spine to crack on illegalities done by all politicians, regardless of how high positions they hold. It has to be ensured that judicial accountability is maintained at all times with every Judge conforming to the highest standards of uprightness and integrity. If Judges cannot independently balance the scales of Justice, the Temples of Justice become pointless.

 

Caroline Kennedy had also very rightly said "The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make decisions independent of the political winds that are blowing"

 

To those very few outdated who have opined that the four Judges should not have gone public,  may we remind them of what Lord Harry Woolf, a former Chief Justice of England had said "Like old clocks, our judicial institutions need to be oiled, wound up and set to true time".



Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006


Mobile No: 9822684372


Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com


You can also reach me on


Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues


Twitter@rodrigues_aires


www.airesrodrigues.com



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Anant Trivedi
Ceng MBCS CITP

Re: [IAC#RG] JUDICIARY NEEDS TO ACT AS TRUE WATCH DOGS OF DEMOCRACY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE

Yes, what the four judges did was very courageous ... a warning that the Indian secular democracy is in real danger ... BJP won the election by 33% of the popular/total vote, not even a simple majority ...

Wake up!

ikp

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:

The mutiny between the four brave senior most Judges of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India was long overdue. This must act as a warning and an alarm to every Indian that our very democracy is in peril.

 

Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer had said "Even so, the creed of judicial independence is our constitutional 'religion' and, if the executive use Article 222 to imperil this basic tenet, the Court must 'do or die'.

 

The Constitution of India is very clear on the distinct roles of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. It envisages a free, fair and independent Judiciary. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary.

 

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with the sanctity of other pillars of our democracy severely dented and having gone for a toss, our only hope now remains on the Judiciary.

 

With the BJP wanting to overpower the Judiciary too, there is a very disturbing disquiet over the slippery slope on which judicial values are slithering. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary, which is the last hope for thecommon man.

 

Any direct or indirect interference by the politicians in the selection and appointment of Judges is a threat to the very Independence of the Judiciary. If the Judiciary is reduced to a mouth piece of the government, the Courts will lose all relevance and end up also as dens of chicanery and jugglery. The Judiciary should never be manned by persons who are tilted or aligned to any political party. Judges should have the spine to crack on illegalities done by all politicians, regardless of how high positions they hold. It has to be ensured that judicial accountability is maintained at all times with every Judge conforming to the highest standards of uprightness and integrity. If Judges cannot independently balance the scales of Justice, the Temples of Justice become pointless.

 

Caroline Kennedy had also very rightly said "The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make decisions independent of the political winds that are blowing"

 

To those very few outdated who have opined that the four Judges should not have gone public,  may we remind them of what Lord Harry Woolf, a former Chief Justice of England had said "Like old clocks, our judicial institutions need to be oiled, wound up and set to true time".



Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006


Mobile No: 9822684372


Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com


You can also reach me on


Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues


Twitter@rodrigues_aires


www.airesrodrigues.com



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Ismail Poonawala
Professor of Arabic & Islamic Studies
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095

Re: [IAC#RG] JUDICIARY NEEDS TO ACT AS TRUE WATCH DOGS OF DEMOCRACY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE

One opinion by one lawyer. The very disturbing revolt by senior judges is playing out, the Indian Common Man needs to very carefully monitor the development and hope The Judges themselves compromise and come to a judicially acceptable settlement at the earliest in order to save our democracy, Cdr, Hirak Nag, an ordinary citizen.  

On ‎Sunday‎, ‎14‎ ‎January‎ ‎2018‎ ‎20‎:‎56‎:‎36‎ ‎IST, Aires Rodrigues <airesrodrigues1@gmail.com> wrote:


The mutiny between the four brave senior most Judges of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India was long overdue. This must act as a warning and an alarm to every Indian that our very democracy is in peril.

 

Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer had said "Even so, the creed of judicial independence is our constitutional 'religion' and, if the executive use Article 222 to imperil this basic tenet, the Court must 'do or die'.

 

The Constitution of India is very clear on the distinct roles of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. It envisages a free, fair and independent Judiciary. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary.

 

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with the sanctity of other pillars of our democracy severely dented and having gone for a toss, our only hope now remains on the Judiciary.

 

With the BJP wanting to overpower the Judiciary too, there is a very disturbing disquiet over the slippery slope on which judicial values are slithering. The highest standards of judicial independence must be ensured by warding off even the faintest trace of governmental influence on the judiciary, which is the last hope for thecommon man.

 

Any direct or indirect interference by the politicians in the selection and appointment of Judges is a threat to the very Independence of the Judiciary. If the Judiciary is reduced to a mouth piece of the government, the Courts will lose all relevance and end up also as dens of chicanery and jugglery. The Judiciary should never be manned by persons who are tilted or aligned to any political party. Judges should have the spine to crack on illegalities done by all politicians, regardless of how high positions they hold. It has to be ensured that judicial accountability is maintained at all times with every Judge conforming to the highest standards of uprightness and integrity. If Judges cannot independently balance the scales of Justice, the Temples of Justice become pointless.

 

Caroline Kennedy had also very rightly said "The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means we have to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make decisions independent of the political winds that are blowing"

 

To those very few outdated who have opined that the four Judges should not have gone public,  may we remind them of what Lord Harry Woolf, a former Chief Justice of England had said "Like old clocks, our judicial institutions need to be oiled, wound up and set to true time".



Aires Rodrigues

Advocate High Court

C/G-2, Shopping Complex

Ribandar Retreat,

Ribandar – Goa – 403006


Mobile No: 9822684372


Office Tel  No: (0832) 2444012

Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com

                         Or

           airesrodrigues@yahoo.com


You can also reach me on


Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues


Twitter@rodrigues_aires


www.airesrodrigues.com


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in