Re: [rti4empowerment] FOR GUIDANCE

the reply of the PIO is correct in my opinion. the application should have been phrased properly, so as to seek a information that is on record, or a prescribed office procedure. PIO will not generate any information for an applicant. in any case, the reply to your question will be a presumption, not covered under the act.

the question can be phrased as:
1 what action has been taken so far, findings so far (sub judicial matter may not be revealed by the PIO, though that is debatable and appealable)
2 certified copies of all file notings
3 what is the prescribed time limit within which such investigations are required to be completed, if any.
4 has any officer been penalized / reprimanded / punished in last three years for delaying the investigation beyond the prescribed time limit or for delaying investigation unduly... etc...

other members can throw more light...

 
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

FOR GUIDANCE

 

On the query for informing the reasons for inordinate delay in concluding the investigation in complaint number 1337/08/8 against the Delhi Development Authority, the CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission has informed that this does not amount to seeking information as defined in section 2(f) of the RTI Act.

 

I want to know from the enlightened members if the reply is in accordance to RTI Act and if not, further course of action, appeal to FAA/ or complaint to CIC or ???????.