Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: Intemperate language used in decisions of the Commission


Yes.

President is competent authority.

But, must lodge complaint with substantial evidences.

For, due investigation by Supreme Court.


-- 
(Babubhai Vaghela)
C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051
M -  94276 08632
http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela
About me in Annexure at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj
http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd
(Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en


--- On Tue, 3/22/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:

From: sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: Intemperate language used in decisions of the Commission
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:29 PM

Can we file a complaint to president of india for removal of mr gandhi?

On 3/22/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr Gupta
>
> Is this deliberate or are you some kind of confused retard ?
>
> The matter which is sub-judice is whether DSGMC is a public authority or
> not. When this issue is pending before a superior court it is grossly
> contemptuous for any public servant  (especially a lower tribunal like Mr
> Gandhi who has adjudicated on the question)  to pass intemperate comments
> (in orders) concerning a party in the matter - and especially where CIC was
> DELETED as a party in the matter.
>
> As I have said, it is a matter for the CIC to sort out internally, as
> citizens we are only here to assist the CIC to see that "justice" is done.
>
> If the members of this house wish I can point out umpteen specific instances
> where Mr Gandhi has *BETRAYED* the RTI movement.
>
> *FOR INSTANCE WILL MR GANDHI DENY (ON ANY PUBLIC FORUM) THAT HE WAS AN
> AUTHOR OF THE 250 WORD + 1 SUBJECT LIMIT ON RTI APPLICATIONS DRAFT RTI RULE.
> *
> This is an open challenge from me to him !!!
>
> Sarbajit.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>> Let the PIO or SGPC file a contempt petition before the Court and in that
>> eventuallity, it will be for Shri Shailesh Gandhi, IC and CIC to defend
>> the
>> action in question and all the doubts will be addressed.  Why r v so much
>> such worried for Mr. Gandhi and he must have given the decision after
>> considering all pros and cons.
>>
>> However, if v buy argument about the matter being sub-judice, in most of
>> the cases, no body will get any information. (Remember cases of CWG and 2G
>> scams).  The PIOs and Public Authorities will file a case before the court
>> and will drag the matter for years to stop the dissimination of
>> information.
>>
>> I recall, in one of the decisions, Mr. Gandhi has pronounced that matter
>> being subjudice is no ground to deny the information unless there is a
>> specific stay and the such question will only arise if after the decision
>> of
>> the CIC, PA approach to the Court to stay the order of the CIC or SICs.
>>
>> If member want, I can give detail or full decision for their benefit.
>>
>


--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.