Saturday, March 5, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Sri Rejimon may kindly explain his nieghbour's affidavit

Dear Guptaji

FIRSTLY. If you have a private quarrel with any member please discuss
it outside this group.

Without prejudice to the above, a close reading of Mr Rejimon's reply
shows that he straightway concedes the truth at least 80% of what
Rajeshwar Rao has written. I shall spare you the detailed analysis /
computation which you can do yourself (and which I am ever ready to
provide publicly if you so desire).

Insofar as Mr Rao's post about 300+ RTI activists being tapped etc,
the same has been filed in affidavit in SC and has also been published
in reputed newspapers.

LASTLY.Your outburst is not surprising that you publicly support and
display your love and affection for some of India's most corrupt
persons on this forum. It is our greatness that you are allowed to
freely say such things here.

Sarbajit

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Mr. Rao claims that he lives outside India.  In the past, he claimed that
> many RTI activists (300?) are on the wacth list of the security agencies.
> When I contronted him to disclose the names, there were tens of ablies and
> one was that these will be disclosed by the wikileakes but nothing
> happened.  Once, I remember that the moderators said that Rao has been
> expllled from the group. Moderators are requested not to make this platform
> a place to spread remours and use for slanderious others and for mud
> slining.  Nothing without proof or convincing explaination should be put up
> on the blog either that may be written by me, Mr Sarbajit or any other
> member.  Unlike his name, Sarbajit has failed to win (jit) the confidence of
> members at large.
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.