Friday, April 22, 2011

[HumJanenge] Bhushan & Bhushan

Dear All,
It is a very interesting point for discussion on the Internet.
First of all - every body wants to get rid of CORRUPTION.
But how ?
Think ....... only LOKPAL Bill will serve the purpose ?
No...... because none of us are clean. So implementation
will be very difficult.
What I feel - the first step (Drafting of the Bill) should be done
by the clean image persons having good knowledge of law and
expertise in drafting such kind of stringent Rules & Regulation.
Neither I am in favour of Bhushan nor Amar Singh - I think we
all want a good clean image person in drafting committee.
Regards,
Subrato Paul
Vaishali, Ghaziabad

--- On Thu, 4/21/11, Amit Arora <amitscorpio@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Amit Arora <amitscorpio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Bhushan & Bhushan
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2011, 5:21 AM

Dear Mr. Roy,

So in your opinion, we should trust Amar Singh instead of the group behind India Against Corruption? I wonder if Amar Singh is such a saint!!

Thanx & Regards

Amit Arora


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr Bhattacharya

Mr Amar Singh (and they are all Honorable men being members of RS) has
again exposed the Bjhushan family business

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Bhushans--PIL-sniffers---Amar-Singh/778980/

excerpts

"It is in public (domain) that the father-son duo are PIL specialists.
One creates a PIL, the other comes to the rescue. No wonder then that
Shanti Bhushan got a farmhouse worth about Rs 10 crore for just Rs 35
lakh after the thorn of Noida Park reached courts," he said at a press
conference on Wednesday.

"What I have gathered is that Shanti Bhushan has acknowledged that the
plot allotments were done through a wrong process. If it is so, I
wonder whether he would return that plot," he said."
:
:
"Amar Singh also rebutted Bhushans' charge that they had never
interacted with him. "Shanti Bhushan claimed that he never spoke with
Mulayam Singh Yadav and Amar Singh. But the fact is that he appeared
for us in a case pertaining to disqualification of some MLAs who had
crossed over to SP. He appeared once in the Allahabad High Court on
February 28, 2006. In fact, he flew to Lucknow in a chartered plane
arranged by me. He appeared twice," he claimed, for which fees were
paid to the lawyer in cash."


On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:21 AM, AK Bhattacharyya
<ajitkbhattacharyya@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Moderator
> So none of them can be trusted and have to be monitored/exposed on their
> business of amassing wealth by well meaning public..
> What do you expect on one Jan Lokpal bill being drafted by such adroit
> liers.Remember always Mahatma Gandhi's opinion on the money making
> shameless professionals.
>
> With kind regards
>
>
>
> A.K.BHATTACHARYYA
>
> F.I.StructE (UK), FIE (India), FIBE, FIRT
> H-2A, Hauzkhas, New Delhi -16, Ph:011-26854127
>
> ________________________________
> From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005
> <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, April 19, 2011 7:14:09 AM
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Bhushan & Bhushan
>
> http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/amar-singh-asks-anna-hazare-to-drop-bhushans/articleshow/8022726.cms
>
> NEW DELHI: Unfazed over former Shanti Bhushan's decision to sue him
> over his alleged role in the 'doctored' CD episode, Amar Singh on
> Monday brought the judiciary and anti-graft crusader Anna Hazare in
> his firing-line.
>
> In a press conference here on Monday evening, Singh dared Hazare to
> drop Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushans from the Lokpal Bill
> drafting panel . "The CD may be unauthorised and illegal, but even
> Shanti Bhushan admits that it contains his voice. He is heard saying
> that the then law minister Hansraj Bhardwaj was corrupt, that the then
> Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan takes bribe to appoint judges,
> that his son Prashant, who files PILs, manages well, and that he has
> very good relations with Justice GS Singhvi, who was then the Chief
> Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. How can such people be
> drafted in the anti-corruption crusade," Singh wondered.
>
> The expelled SP leader repeatedly took Justice Singhvi's name. He has
> been presiding over the apex court bench hearing the 2G spectrum scam.
> "Shanti Bhushan is heard boasting about his son Prashant's equations
> with Justice Singhvi, claiming at one point that when the latter was
> the Chief Justice of the AP High Court, he could get anything done in
> his court. Justice Singhvi has now reserved his judgement on the
> petition filed by Prashant Bhushan seeking the lifting of the stay of
> the ban on the telecast of the tapes featuring me."
>
> "I want to ask Singhviji how could he entertain a petition from a
> person who habitually talks ill about the judiciary, who said things
> against the present Chief Justice of India SH Kapadia, forcing him to
> initiate contempt proceedings. How could he make him an amicus," Singh
> asked.
>
> The expelled SP leader said, at the same time, that he did not want to
> say anything against the judiciary, but only wanted to bring certain
> things before its notice. "I don't want to comment on the judiciary
> because everyone is afraid of it. I am also afraid of it. Even Prime
> Minister Manmohan Singh had to bow before it,'' Amar Singh said.
>
> He said that he too was filing a case in the Delhi Police on the
> distribution of CDs. "I will also file a case of contempt against the
> Bhushans in the Supreme Court," he asserted.
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.