Saturday, April 23, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!

Hypocritcal or hypothetical ?

As per me, Anna Hazare is not eligible for the post of CVC (. But neither was Annapurna Dixit to be appointed as an IC. Eternal vigilance is the watchword --. If we dont defend our rights they will be taken from us.

Unfortunately we have a surplus of lazy, useless, hypocrites of the armchair variety (("a corrupt Lokpal Bill is better than no Lokpal Bill at all") in this group. I think it is high time we get rid of all the deadwood from our groups.

Sarbajit

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
sarbajit
plz dont make hypocratical asumptions
anna will never be CVC.

 
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sankar

As I have already asked the concerned Ministry, I need to know why say
Mr Shanti Bhushan or Mr Anna Hazare is "cleaner" than me. Or
conversely why I am "dirtier" / "blacker" than they are. It is only
when every clean and honest citizen of India starts formally demanding
to know these things (as we are entitled to demand to know in law)
that there will be transparency in public appointments and clean
people will be selected.

Tomorrow if  DoPT suggests Mr Shanti Bhushan or Mr Anna Hazare as
Chief Vigilance Commissioner should we accept this like little sheep ?

Sarbajit

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.