Tuesday, September 20, 2011

[rti4empowerment] Re: a Catalogue of Legal Solutions

Dear Sandeep,
 
What did you intend to convey by an otherwise blank reply having only :) sign?
 
There is an old story. A man killed both his wife & her paramor. He was caught & arraingned. Judge asked him why he took law in his own hands. Pat came his reply,
 
" My Lord, I have money, neither to buy the law , nor dine the judge" 

WEDS
From: Sandeep Jalan <legallyspeaking.jalan@gmail.com>
To: DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011, 0:05
Subject: Re: a Catalogue of Legal Solutions
:)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:03 AM, DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Thank Sandeep Jalan,
 
However, paradox is Indian Judiciary is  the most corrupt institution in India. Secondly Indian Judiciary is arroogant.  Thirdly  all functionaries of state as defined in Art. 12 of The Constitution of India  perpetrate corruption & injustice, & we the citizens are obliged to seek justice from them. It is as paradoxical as asking a rapist to adjudicate upon rape he committed.
 
Democracy means  participation by all; a government in any democracy is a government by a people; of the people & for the people is nothing but farce!!!!
 
 Being apractising lawyer & being a law graduate both of us know it.
WEDS

From: Sandeep Jalan <legallyspeaking.jalan@gmail.com>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 20 September 2011, 7:03
Subject: a Catalogue of Legal Solutions
Dear Friend,
 
May read this.
(AA) 
WHEN  GRIEVANCE  IS AGAINST  ANY  GOVT  /  STATUTORY  /  MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY / ANY PUBLIC  AUTHORITY  /  PUBLIC  OFFICER  –  depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  the  likely  Remedies  may  be
 
(i) Recording  complaint  /  Notice to the concerned Public authority OR to its Regulating Authority,   followed  by  filing  Writ  Petition  in  the  High  Court.
 
(ii) Those who have not immediate access to High Court, may file a Civil Suit before the District Court, for the relief of mandatory Injunction, as defined under Section 39 read with Section 2(a) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking necessary reliefs. But before filing Civil Suit against any Public authority, one is obliged to give notice under section 80 of CPC, 1908, to the concerned Public authority. However, in urgent situation, one can file the Suit without issuing the said notice, specifying therein the reasons for urgency in filing the Suit.
 
(iii) When it is alleged that a Public Officer is occupying a Public Office although he/she does not satisfy the qualifications prescribed for holding that Public office, then a Writ of Quo Warranto may be filed in the High Court.
 
(iv) Recording  complaint  to  Anti  corruption  agencies  like  CBI,  ACB,  CVC;
 
(v) Recording  complaint  to  Human  Rights  Commission;
 
(vi) When grievance is against a particular Public servant, then depending  upon  the  nature  of  alleged  illegal  acts of said Public Servant, FIR  to  Police under  Section  166, 167, 217, 218, 220, 409  or  under  any  other  Section  of  IPC  1860 may be made, or a complaint may directly be made before respective Magistrates Court under section 200 of CrPC, 1973.
 
(vii) Where  the  grievance  is  in  particularly  relating  public  nuisance,  then  Recording  complaint  to  District  Magistrate (Collectorate of the District) /  Commissioner  of  Police (in Metropolitan areas),  under  section  133  of CrPC, 1973 may be made.  Refer Landmark SC  Judgment - Ratlam  Municipality  versus  Vardichand, year 1980.
 
(viii) Recording  a  complaint as aforesaid, followed by an RTI  application,  thereby  seeking  information  as what action has been taken on the complaint made,  so  as  to  compel Public servants  to  perform  their  duties.
 
 
 
 
(BB) 
WHEN  FACING  ILLEGALITY  BY  POLICE,  INCLUDING  ILLEGAL  ARREST  OR  ILLEGAL  SUMMONS, ETC  – 
 
HERE four KIND OF ILLEGALITIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED
 
 
ILLEGALITY No.1 
WHEN  POLICE  REFUSES  TO  REGISTER  FIR
 
(i) Approaching the Superintendent  of  Police  or  Commissioner  of  Police and recording the FIR / complaint with him;
 
(ii) A private  Complaint against those persons can be registered before Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate  under section 200 of CrPC, 1973, seeking relief, Magistrate directing the Police to register an FIR and investigate the case [section 156(3) of CrPC, 1973] OR in the alternative, Magistrate may himself made an Inquiry into the offence complained of (section 155 of CrPC, 1973), OR Magistrate may directly issue summons to the person made accused in the complaint (section 202 of CrPC, 1973) ;
 
(iii) A private complaint as aforesaid can be registered before Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate under section 200 of CrPC, 1973,  against those Police officers who have refused to register FIR under section 217 of IPC, 1860;
 
(iv) Filing Contempt Petition against Police officers who have refused to register FIR. There  are series of High Courts and in Supreme Court  Judgments which clearly  mandates  that  Police  must  register  FIR  whoever  comes  to them,  when  the  Complaint  discloses  a Cognizable  offence. Also, refusing to register an FIR amounts to criminal contempt of the court. The Contempt proceedings are held only in High Courts and in Supreme Court. If criminal contempt is alleged, then permission of the Advocate General of the respective State must be obtained before filing Contempt Petition;
 
(v) Also,  Complaint  to  Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate  under  section  200  of  CrpC  1973  as aforesaid can  be  made  where if  the  alleged  offence  is  defined as Non  Cognizable offence, popularly known as NC.
 
 
 
ILLEGALITY  NO.2 
 
WHEN  FALSE  FIR IS REGISTERED AGAINST ONE; AND ARREST IS ANTICIPATED  – THEN DEPENDING UPON THE PECULIAR FACTS OF EACH CASE,
FOLLOWING ACTION MAY BE TAKEN –
 
(i) Recording a  letter  to  the  concerned  Police station where the false FIR is filed, with a copy to Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police, requesting the Police authority to scrupulously / strictly follow the due process of law and strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case, in case the  Police intends to arrest the Person named in the false FIR;
 
(ii) Obtaining Anticipatory Bail from Sessions court or High Court under section  438  of CrPC, 1973;
 
(iii) A private complaint as aforesaid can be registered before Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate  under section 200 of CrPC, 1973, against those Police officers who have knowingly registered false FIR / or have falsely arrested / or are falsely prosecuting the case, alleging therein your complaint that said Police officer have committed the offence defined under section 218 and 220 of IPC, 1860;
 
(iv) Filing a Writ Petition in the High Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, i.e. directing the Police authorities to scrupulously follow the due process of law and strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case, in case the Police intend to arrest the Petitioner;
 
(v) File  Petition  under  Section  482  of  CrPC  before  respective  High  Court,  for High Court in the exercise of their inherent powers,  quash the  false  FIR;
 
(vi) Where the charge sheet is filed, the innocent person may endeavour to get discharge under section 227, 239 of CrPC, 1973;
 
(vii) If Criminal proceedings are initiated on the basis of such false FIR, then, an Application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC 1973, may be taken out before the concerned trial Court, against those persons who have knowingly filed the false FIR, taking aid of section 182 and 211 of IPC, 1860.
(IPC Section 182: False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person.
IPC Section 211: False charge of offence made with intent to injure.)
 
(viii) Compensation may be sought against the persons under section 250 of CrPC, 1973, who have knowingly filed false FIR.
 
 
ILLEGALITY  NO.3
WHEN  POLICE ILLEGALLY  ARREST –
 
(i) The arrested person or his relative / friend to record  a  Letter  to  the  concerned  Police  station, stating therein about  the  position  of  law  as  regards  to  restrictions in powers  of  arrests, that  the Police  officer effecting arrest is not following the mandate of law and knowingly disregarding the guidelines framed by SC in the case  of  Joginder  Kumar versus State of U.P., 1994, for effecting arrests.
Relevant  sections pertaining to powers of arrests are  41,  57, 157, 167,  172, 389, 436,  437,  438,  439 of  CrPC, 1973.
 
(ii) The relative / friend of the arrested person may file a Writ  Petition  of  Habeas  Corpus  before  respective  High  Court  for  alleged  illegal  arrest;
 
 
(iii) When the arrested person is produced before the Judicial Magistrates, the arrested person or his relative / friend may present a Bail Application / seeking Declaration before concerned Magistrates  Court to declare the said arrest as illegal; Any person who is arrested must be produced before the nearest Judicial Magistrates court within 24 hours of his arrest.
 
(iv) Application for subsistence allowance for his dependent, if  Bail  is  refused. Presently law doesn't make provision for subsistence allowance. It is my case that a person so arrested, may in certain circumstances should get subsistence allowance for his dependent;
 
(v) If  one  cannot  go  to  High  Court  for  Writ  Petition  of  Habeas  Corpus,  then,  Application  or should  be  made  to  State  Human  Rights  Commission,  National  Human  Rights  Commission, Supreme  Court  and  also  to  respective  High  Court,  about  the  said  arrest effected,  in  willful disregard  of  the  directions  given  by  the  SC  in  Joginder  Kumar  case; followed by RTI  Application  to  State  Human  Rights  Commission,  National  Human  Rights  Commission,  to  Supreme  Court  and  to  respective  High  Court,  on  steps  taken  by  them  in  pursuance  to  letter  sent  to  them.  Life and  Liberty  clause  under  RTI may be invoked to obtain information within 48 hours;
 
(vi) Writ  of  mandamus seeking  exemplary  Damages / Compensation  from  respective  State  Government,  but  only  after  the  High  Court  in  the  Writ  of  Habeas  Corpus, OR  the  concerned Magistrates Court grant Bail on the basis of representation made to it, OR the concerned  Human  Rights  Commission  comes  to  the  conclusion  that  the  said  arrest  was  illegal;
 
(vii) A Contempt Petition before HC can be filed alleging therein that the Police illegally arrested the Petitioner in willful disobedience to SC guidelines framed in Joginder Kumar case.
 
 
ILLEGALITY  NO.4
When  police  neglects  to  investigating  the  case.
 
(i) Writ Petition  under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with  section  482  of  CrPC  1973,  to  the  respective  High  Court, thereby HC directing the Police to make thorough investigation;
 
(ii) Writ Petition  under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with  section  482  of  CrPC  1973,  to  the  respective  High  Court, thereby HC directing the State Govt to refer the case to an independent agency like CBI or CID for investigation;
 
(iii) A private complaint can be made before Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate  under section 200 read with 202(1) of CrPC, 1973, for Hon'ble Magistrate to cause to inquire into the case himself, instead of directing police investigation u/s 156(3) of CrPC, 1973.
 
(iv) An FIR or private complaint under section 217, 221 of IPC, 1860, can be registered before Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate  under section 200 of CrPC, 1973, against those Police officers who have neglected to investigate the case;
 
 
 
 
(CC) 
WHEN A CHEQUE IS DISHONOURED –
depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  the  likely  Remedies  may  be
 
(i) A  Summary  Suit,  contemplated  under  Order XXXVII  of  Civil  Procedure  Code,  1908,  in  the  High  Court  or  District  Court,  can  be  filed  for  the  recovery  of  dishonoured  cheque  amount;
 
(ii) Issuing  statutory  Notice  under  Section  138  of  Negotiable  Instrument  Act  1881,  followed  by  filing  Criminal  Complaint  to  the  Judicial  Magistrate / Metropolitan Magistrate;
 
(iii) In  case,  the  dishonoured  cheque  was  given  by  a  individual  or  by  a  proprietorship  firm  or  by  a  Partnership  firm,  a notice followed  by  Insolvency  Petition  in  the  High  Court  or  in the  District  Court,  can  be  filed  against  that  individual  /  proprietor  /  partners;
 
(iv) In  case,  the  dishonoured  cheque  was  given  by  a  Private  or  Public  Limited  Company,  a  Statutory  Notice u/s 433 / 434 / 439 of the Companies Act, 1956,  followed  by  Winding  up  Petition  can  be  filed  in  the  High  Court  against  that  Company;
 
(v) a  complaint  to  Police  or  private  Complaint,  under  section  200  of CrPC, 1973,  to  Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate can  be  filed, of the offence of cheating against the said individual  /  proprietor  /  partners / officials of the Company;
 
 
 
 
 
(DD) 
WHEN ONE IS TO RECOVER SPECIFIED DEBT / MONEY, i.e. TO SAY RECOVERY OF LOAN, MONEY DUE UNDER COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS, MONEY DUE UNDER ANY CONTRACT / AGREEMENT, MONEY TO BE RECOVERED BY VIRTUE OF ANY LEGAL RIGHT / UNDER STATUTE, WHETHER FROM A PRIVATE PERSON / INDIVIDUAL OR FROM ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY –
depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  the  likely  Remedies  may  be  –
 
(i) If  there  exist  any  Arbitration  clause  in  the  Contract  /  Agreement  or  in  the  absence  of  Arbitration  clause,  by  consent  of  the  other  side,  one  may  adopt  Arbitration  proceedings  for  the  resolution  of  the  dispute;
 
(ii) A  Summary  Suit,  contemplated  under  Order XXXVII  of  Civil  Procedure  Code,  1908,  in  the  High  Court  or  District  Court  can  be  filed  for  the  recovery  of  that  specified  debt  /  amount;
 
(iii) In  case,  the  specified  ascertained debt    /  amount  is  to  be  recovered    from  an  individual  or  from  a  proprietorship  firm  or  from  a  Partnership  firm,  depending  upon  the  acts  of  the  defaulter, a notice  followed  by  Insolvency  Petition  in  the  High  Court  or  the  District  Court,  can  be  filed  against  that  individual  /  proprietor  /  partners;
 
(iv) In  case,  the  specified  ascertained  debt    /  amount  is  to  be  recovered  from  a  Private  or  Public  Limited  Company,  a  Statutory  Notice under section 433 / 434 / 439 of the Companies Act, 1956,   followed  by  Winding  up  Petition  can  be  filed  in  the  High  Court  against  that  Company;
 
(v) Depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  a  complaint  to  Police  or  private  Complaint,  under  section  200  of CrPC, 1973,  to  Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate can  be  filed.  
 
 
 
 
(EE)
WHERE ONE HAS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED DEFECTIVE GOODS OR ONE HAS ALLEGED TO HAVE RENDERED DEFICIENT SERVICES, OR WHERE ANY PERSON IS ALLEGED TO HAVE INDULGING IN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES –
depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  the  likely  Remedies  may  be
 
(i) A  Consumer  complaint can be filed, depending upon the amount of compensation claimed,  before  the  appropriate  District  Forum  /  State  Commission  or before  the  National  Commission;
 
(ii) For  deficiency  in  respect  of  Banking  services,  Banking  Ombudsman  may  be  approached; Please visit RBI website.
 
(iii) Depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  a  complaint  to  Police  or  private  Complaint,  under  section  200  of CrPC, 1973,  to  Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate can  be  filed;
 
 
(iv) A complaint to respective governmental regulatory body of said defaulting company can be made alleging the said company indulging in unfair trade practices; and in the event the said  governmental regulatory body refuses to take any action against the said company, then, a Writ Petition can be filed against that  governmental regulatory body, in the respective High Court, seeking relief from HC, directing the said  governmental regulatory body to take appropriate action against that company indulging in unfair trade practices. What amounts to unfair trade practice is defined in the Consumer Protection Act, in the definition clause.
 
(v) Where the defaulting Company is a Governmental Company / authority, then, a Writ Petition can be filed against that  Governmental Company / authority, in the respective High Court, seeking relief from HC, directing the said  Governmental Company / authority, either to compensate the Petitioner / or such other relief as may be permitted under the Statute / Act in which the said defaulting company is constituted.
 
(vi)  A complaint may be made to Competition Commission of India.
 
The  goods  will  include  all  kinds  of  goods  (Sale  of  goods  Act)  and  Services  includes  –  Banking  services,  Financial  services,  Transport  /  Cargo  services,  Courier services, Housing,  Cellular  services,  Internet,  Insurance,  credit  card, Medical, Educational  etc.
 
 
 
 
 (FF) 
WHEN  YOU  ARE  HOLDING  SHARES  IN  A  PRIVATE  /  PUBLIC  LIMITED  COMPANY  –  AND  YOU  HAVE  GRIEVANCE  AGAINST  A  COMPANY  OR  YOU  HAVE  A  GRIEVANCE  AGAINST  THE  STOCK  BROKER  OR  YOU  HAVE  A  GRIEVANCE  AGAINST  THE  STOCK  EXCHANGE  –  
depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  the  likely  Remedies  may  be  –
 
(i) So far as may be permissible under the law, and if there  exist  any  Arbitration  clause  in  the  Contract  /  Agreement  or  in  the  absence  of  Arbitration  clause,  by  consent  of  the  other  side,  one may  adopt  Arbitration  proceedings  for  the  resolution  of  the  dispute;
 
(ii) Complaint to  SEBI: Categories of complaints that may be made to SEBI. All these complaints can be made online, at prescribed format therein provided in SEBI website.
 
1.     Against Listed Companies – like – Refund / Allotment / Dividend / Transfer / Bonus / Rights/ Redemption / Interest;
·        Pre-listing / Offer Document
·        De-listing of Shares / Securities
·        Buy-Back of Shares / Securities
·        Takeover and Restructuring
·        Corporate Governance / Listing Conditions
 
2.     Registrar and Transfer Agents
 
3.     Stock Brokers
4.     Sub Brokers
5.     Portfolio Managers
6.     Stock Exchanges
 
7.     Depository
 
8.     Mutual Fund Companies
 
9.     Collective Investment Schemes
10.                        Merchant Bankers
11.                        Debenture Trustees
12.                        Bankers to an issue
13.                        Credit Rating Agencies
14.                        Custodian of Securities
15.                        Foreign Institutional Investors
16.                        Underwriters
17.                        Venture Capital Funds
 
18.                        Price / Market manipulations
19.                        Insider Trading
 
(iii) Petition  to  Company  Law  Board for Oppression and Mismanagement, disputes relating to non transfer of Shares, non refund of Public deposits, directing investigation  to  Serious  Fraud  Investigation  Office u/s 235 of the Companies Act, 1956 etc.;
 
(iv) Civil Suit for  Injunction  /  Declaration  before  District  Court;
 
(v) Winding  up  Petition  to  the  respective  High  Court;
 
(vi) Depending  upon  the  nature  of  one's  case,  a  complaint  to  Police  or  private  Complaint,  under  section  200  of CrPC, 1973,  to  Judicial  Magistrate /  Metropolitan  Magistrate can  be  filed;
 
(vii) Where the defaulting Company / organization is a Governmental authority, then, a Writ Petition can be filed against that  Governmental authority, in the respective High Court, seeking relief from HC, directing the said  Governmental authority, either to compensate the Petitioner / or such other relief as may be permitted under the Statute / Act in which the said defaulting company is constituted;
 
(viii) A complaint to respective governmental Regulatory body of said defaulting company / organization can be made alleging the nature of grievance one has against the said company / organization; and in the event the said  governmental regulatory body refuses to take any action against the said company / organization, then, a Writ Petition can be filed against that  governmental regulatory body, in the respective High Court, seeking relief from HC, directing the said  governmental regulatory body to take appropriate action against that company / organization.
 
 
 
 
 
 
(GG)
DISPUTES RELATING TO IMMOVABLE PROERTIES:
 
(1)     WHEN THE BUILDER / DEVELOPER FAILS TO GIVE POSSESSION OF FLAT WITHIN AGREED TIME; OR THE BUILDER FAILS TO PROVIDE THE AMENITIES AGREED IN THE AGREEMENT; OR THE BUILDER VIOLATE ANY PROVISION OF LAW WITH RESPECT TO CONCERNED BUILDING / STRUCTURE, THEREBY VIOLATING THE CONTRACT SO ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE BUILDER / DEVELOPER AND THE FLAT BUYER
(i) Complaint before Consumer Forum / State Commission / National Commission may be filed for "deficiency of services";
(ii) If there is Arbitration clause in the Agreement between the Builder / Developer and the property buyer, then, Arbitration proceedings should be adopted;
(iii) A criminal complaint / FIR before Police or private complaint, u/s 200 of CrPC, 1973, before Magistrate, may be filed, alleging "cheating" or any other applicable offence depending upon the facts of each case;
(iv) A Civil Suit for Specific performance of Agreement / damages for breach of contract may be filed before District Court, and in certain cases, before High Court;
 
 
(2) WHERE ONE IS FORCIBLY DISPOSSESSED OR ANTICIPATING FORCIBLE DISPOSSESSION FROM HIS LAWFUL POSSESSION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY –
(i) A complaint to Executive Magistrate u/s 145 of CrPC, 1973, subject to satisfaction of existence of elements necessary, may be made for immediate restoration of possession / preventing dispossession, as the case may be.
 (ii) A civil suit u/s 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, may be filed before the District Court for immediate restoration of possession.
 
 
(3)              WHERE THE LICENSEE REFUSE TO VACATE THE PREMISES EVEN AFTER THE TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT; DISPUTES BETWEEN LANDLORD AND TENANT;
(i) If the property is situated within Maharashtra, the dispute between Landlord & Tenant and between Licensor and Licensee may be referred before competent authority constituted under Maharashtra Rent control Act, 1999;
 (ii) Small Causes Courts, constituted under the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act 1881 / Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1881,  have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between Landlord & Tenant and between Licensor and Licensee.
 
 
 
(4) IN AN AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, WHERE ANY PARTY REFUSE TO PERFORM HIS PART OF PROMISE SO MADE IN THE AGREEMENT / CONTRACT;
(i) A Civil Suit for Specific performance of Agreement may be filed before District Court, and in certain cases before High Court;
 
 
(5)     WHERE A PERSON WAS GIVEN POSSESSION (LICENSE) OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY ON GRATUITOUS BASIS AND THE SAID PERSON REFUSE TO VACATE THE PREMISES - 
(i) If the property is situated within Maharashtra, the dispute may be referred before competent authority constituted under Maharashtra control Act, 1999;
(ii) Small Causes Courts, constituted under the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act 1881 / Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1881,  have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between Landlord & Tenant and between Licensor and Licensee.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(HH) 
when someone has filed a case in the court of law, making false claim therein
 
(i) It is a criminal offence for making false claim against any person in the court of law and is punishable under section 209 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. An application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC, 1973, may be taken out in the court in which the said false and frivolous case is filed against said person.
 
(ii) An application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC, 1973, may be taken out as aforesaid alleging that the said person has knowingly made false statements in Affidavit and thus has committed the offence of perjury as defined under section 181, 191 and 199 of IPC, 1860.
 
(iii) If a Civil Suit is filed in this regard, then following provisions of CPC, 1908 may be invoked –
(a) Order VI Rule 16; (this provisions will be also extremely useful when one has a very strong and prima facie case against the opposite parties)
 
(b) Order VII Rule 11;
(c) Or non compliance to all applicable provisions contained in Order VI and Order VII may be alleged;
 
(d) Order XII Rule 6; (this provisions will be also extremely useful when one has a very strong and prima facie case against the opposite parties)
 
(e) Order XIV Rule 1,2, 6; (this provisions will be also extremely useful when one has a very strong and prima facie case against the opposite parties)
 
(f) Order XV Rule 1, 2, 3;
 
(g) Order XXV Rule 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(II)
WHEN A PERSON AGAINST WHOM SUMMONS HAVE BEEN ISSUED AND HE EVADES TO RECEIVE THAT SUMMONS
 
(i) An application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC, 1973, may be taken out as aforesaid, alleging therein that the said person is evading to receive Summons and is liable to be punished under section 172 and 174 of IPC, 1860.
 
 
 
 
(JJ)
WHEN A PERSON MAKES A FALSE STATEMENT / FALSE DECLARATIONS IN HIS PLEADINGS OR FILES A FALSE AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE COURT OF LAW OR KNOWINGLY GIVES A FALSE EVIDENCE TO THE COURT
 
(i) An application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC, 1973, may be taken out as aforesaid alleging that the said person is evading to receive Summons and is liable to be punished under applicable section 181, 191, 196 and 199 of IPC, 1860.
 
(ii) There are instances where the Courts have viewed such acts of perjury as criminal contempt of the court. Therefore, Contempt proceedings may be initiated alleging criminal contempt of the court. Sanction of Advocate General is condition precedent for initiating Criminal contempt proceedings; or in the alternative the Hon'ble Court may be requested to take su moto cognizance of said act of perjury.
 
 
 
 
 
(KK)
Where a false complaint has been filed in the Magistrates Court and the Magistrate has issued Summons / Or where a genuine complaint has been filed but the Magistrate has refused to issue Summons
 
(i) The person against whom said Summons have been issued or the person whose genuine complaint is dismissed, may prefer a Revision Application before Sessions Court challenging the said Order of the Magistrate.
 
(ii) If Criminal proceedings are initiated on the basis of such false complaint, then, an Application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC 1973, may be taken out before the concerned trial Court, against those persons who have knowingly filed the false complaint, taking aid of section 182 and 211 of IPC, 1860.
(IPC Section 182: False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person.
IPC Section 211: False charge of offence made with intent to injure.)
 
(iii) Compensation may be sought against the persons under section 250 of CrPC, 1973, who have knowingly filed false FIR.
 
 
(LL)
Where one is aggrieved by the illegal Order of the Court
 
(i) Subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, a Writ Petition of Certiorari under Article 226 OR under jurisdiction of Superintendence over all subordinate courts Article 227 may be filed before High Court, challenging said illegal Order.
 
 
 
 
 
(MM)
Where one is aggrieved by the fact that the court is acting illegally / court is not exercising the powers / and the court may pass a manifestly illegal Order
 
(i) Subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, a Writ Petition of Prohibition under Article 226 OR under jurisdiction of Superintendence over all subordinate courts Article 227 may be filed before High Court, challenging said illegal act of omission.
 
 
 
 
SCHEDULE – AA1
Writ Petitions: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA2
Complaint / Notice to public authority
SCHEDULE – AA3
Writ of Mandamus – for enforcing "Right of Reply" for complaint made
SCHEDULE – AA4
Writ of Mandamus – for enforcing the mandate of law / constitutional /  statutory provisions
SCHEDULE – AA5
Writ of Mandamus – for enforcing fundamental / statutory rights
SCHEDULE – AA6
Writ of Mandamus – for seeking damages / compensation
SCHEDULE – AA7
Writ of Mandamus – for implementation of Reports of Committees / Commissions
SCHEDULE – AA8
Writ of Mandamus – for prevention of fundamental / statutory rights being frustrated
SCHEDULE – AA9
Writ of Mandamus – for challenging the arbitrary exercise of powers / acts of Public authorities / State
SCHEDULE – AA10
Writ of Mandamus – challenging the constitutional validity of State action / Legislation / Rules / Policy decision of State, by way of for Judicial Review
SCHEDULE – AA11
Writ of Mandamus – for preventing State from waste of Public money
SCHEDULE – AA12
Writ of Mandamus – where proper hearing is not given to a citizen by a Public authority / or where a Public authority passes unreasoned order
SCHEDULE – AA13
Civil suits: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA14
draft civil suit
SCHEDULE – AA15
Writ of Quo Warranto
SCHEDULE – AA16
Human Rights Commission: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA17
Draft Complaint to Human Rights Commission
SCHEDULE – AA18
FIR: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA19
Draft FIR to police
SCHEDULE – AA20
Draft Complaint to Magistrate u/s 200 of CrPC, 1973
SCHEDULE – AA21
Section 133 of crpc, 1973: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA22
Draft complaint to District  Magistrate (Collectorate of the District) /  Commissioner  of Police]
SCHEDULE – AA23
Judgment - Ratlam  Municipality  versus Vardichand
SCHEDULE – AA24
RTI: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – AA25
Draft RTI Application
SCHEDULE – BB1
Contempt of Courts: BRIEF UNDERSTANDING
SCHEDULE – BB2
DRAFT Contempt Petition
SCHEDULE – BB3
draft Letter to police station to deal with false FIR
SCHEDULE – BB4
Bails / Anticipatory Bails: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – BB5
draft Anticipatory Bail Application
SCHEDULE – BB6
Writ of Mandamus –  follow the due process of law and strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case
SCHEDULE – BB7
Writ of Mandamus – Section  482  of  CrPC to  quash the  false  FIR
SCHEDULE – BB8
Draft Application under section 227, 239 of CrPC, 1973, for the discharge of accused person from offences charged
SCHEDULE – BB9
Draft Application under section 340 read with section 195 of CrPC 1973
SCHEDULE – BB10
Draft Application under section 250 of CrPC 1973
SCHEDULE – BB11
draft Letter to concerned  Police  station that  the Police  officer effecting arrest is not following the mandate of law and knowingly disregarding the guidelines framed by SC in the case  of  Joginder  Kumar versus State of U.P, 1994.
SCHEDULE – BB12
Writ of Habeas Corpus – for immediately producing the arrested person before the High Court
SCHEDULE – BB13
draft Bail Application
SCHEDULE – BB14
draft Application for subsistence allowance where arrest is effected
SCHEDULE – BB15
Draft Application to State / National Human Rights Commission about arrest effected,  in  willful disregard  of  the  directions  given  by  the  SC  in  Joginder  Kumar  case
SCHEDULE – BB16
DRAFT Application to SC / HC about arrest effected,  in  willful disregard  of  the  directions  given  by  the  SC  in  Joginder  Kumar  case
SCHEDULE – BB17
Draft RTI Application to State / National Human
Rights Commission / SC / HC to follow up the complaint made in respect of arrest effected,  in  willful disregard  of  the  directions  given  by  the  SC  in  Joginder  Kumar  case
SCHEDULE – BB18
Summons by police for Investigation: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – BB19
draft Letter when police summons for investigation in violation to provisions of crpc, 1973
SCHEDULE – BB20
Writ of Mandamus – HC directing the Police to make thorough investigation
SCHEDULE – BB21
Writ of Mandamus – HC directing the State Govt to refer the case to an independent agency like CBI or CID for investigation
SCHEDULE – CC1
Summary Suit: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – CC2
Draft Summary Suit
SCHEDULE – CC3
Cheque, a Negotiable Instruments: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – CC4
Draft Statutory Notice under Section 138
SCHEDULE – CC5
Insolvency proceedings: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – CC6
Draft insolvency Notice
SCHEDULE – CC7
Draft Insolvency Petition
SCHEDULE – CC8
Draft company Winding up Notice
SCHEDULE – CC9
Draft company Winding up Petition
SCHEDULE – DD1
Arbitration: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – EE1
Consumer Protection law: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – EE2
Draft "consumer" Notice
SCHEDULE – EE3
Draft Consumer Complaint
SCHEDULE – EE4
Important Judgments with respect to Banking Services
SCHEDULE – EE5
Unfair Trade Practices: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – EE6
competition commission of india: brief understanding
SCHEDULE – EE7
draft complaint to competition commission of india
SCHEDULE – FF1
Types of complaints that may be before SEBI
SCHEDULE – FF2
Types of complaints that may be before Company Law Board
SCHEDULE – FF3
Draft Company Petition before company law board
SCHEDULE – FF4
Winding up of Companies: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – GG1
Brief understanding and Draft Application under section 145 of CrPC, 1973, to   Executive Magistrate designated by State Govt / Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police
SCHEDULE – GG2
Application before Competent Authority constituted under maharashtra rent control act
SCHEDULE – II-1
Offences regarding Summons: Sections 172 and 174 of IPC: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – JJ1
Offences regarding making false statements / giving false evidence: Sections 181, 191, 196 and 199 of IPC: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – KK1
Draft Revision Application under section….. of CrPC 1973 before sessions court to challenge the order of magistrates court
SCHEDULE – LL1
Writ of Certiorari
SCHEDULE – MM1
Writ of Prohibition
SCHEDULE – NN  
Law of Limitations: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – OO  
inherent powers of courts: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – PP  
principles of natural justice: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – QQ  
principles of interpretation of statutes: Brief understanding
SCHEDULE – RR  
introduction to law and justice
 
 
 
 
 
DISCLAIMER
Though due care has been observed in framing this WRITE UP, yet some discrepancies may have certainly entered in. This write up is framed with the limited understanding of the author. There is every likelihood that the suggestions made by author and legal views contained in Schedules, may turn out to be inappropriate / incorrect. This Write will be regularly updated with the development of law and better understanding of the author. 
 
In the circumstances, it is expressly agreed between Readers and this author that this author incurs no liability of whatsoever nature, if a reader claims to have incurred any loss of any nature, while using this Write up.
 
The readers are clearly and strongly advised to obtain guidance of Legal experts or of any other person as they think fit, before they act upon the suggestions made in this write up.
 
It is also requested that if a reader finds any discrepancy, or has any suggestion to improve upon this, may please kindly mail me at legallyspeaking.jalan@gmail.com
 
 
and, If you find this useful, consider it to share with your friends & relatives.
 
Thanks.
Sandeep Jalan, Advocate,
Mumbai,
India.
 
 
 
 
 
 
How to deal with illegal notices of Indian Public authorities http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2010/05/do-we-have-discretion-to-disobey.html
 
 
                 
                   A aggrieved's act of seeking courts' intervention, in fact, is an appeal to the judicial conscience of the sitting judge, to do that - which all prudent man will do, in the facts of the case.
 
--
--
Sandeep Jalan
Advocate
Mumbai
 
 
How to deal with illegal notices of Indian Public authorities http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.com/2010/05/do-we-have-discretion-to-disobey.html
 
 
                 
                   A aggrieved's act of seeking courts' intervention, in fact, is an appeal to the judicial conscience of the sitting judge, to do that - which all prudent man will do, in the facts of the case.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)