Re: [HumJanenge] Hindustan Times (13 Oct): Right To Information - a fundamental right?

The Delhi High Court (Division bench) has already ruled on this
concerning appointment if Central ICs..

It should be recalled that the petition / appeal was filed by a set of
Mumbai RTI "activists" (aka "Parasites") who were hand-in-glove with
DoPT to destroy RTI Act. I will not name them
again here because most of them were too ashamed to stay on in this
group after their debacle which we repeatedly cautioned them not to
pursue.

Sarbajit

On 10/13/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr HC Arora, advocate, president rti activists federation, punjab and
> haryana has filed a writ petition in the punjab and haryana high
> court challenging the selection of some of the information
> commissioners in punjab and haryana. the court has been requested to
> direct the governments to frame a proper procedure. the next hearing
> is in december. let us wait for its outcome. The same case (if outcome
> is positive) can be used to challenge appointments elsewhere.
>
> On 10/13/11, bobby ramakant <bobbyramakant@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> RIGHT TO INFORMATION- A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT?
>> Naveen Tewari
>> Published in: The Hindustan Times, 13 October 2011
>> ************************
>>
>> THE FIRST SHOCK CAME WHEN THE U.P. GOVERNMENT APPOINTED THE STATE CHIEF
>> INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS.
>>
>> ALARM BELLS STARTED RINGING IN OUR MINDS.
>>
>> THE APPOINTMENTS RAISED SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW SERIOUSLY THE
>> GOVERNMENT
>> OF UTTAR PRADESH HAD TAKEN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACT IN LETTER AND
>> SPIRIT
>>
>>
>> The Right to Information Act was passed in India in the year 2005. But the
>> founding fathers of our constitution had already enshrined it in the
>> constitution as a fundamental right under article 19(1-a). The right was
>> not
>> exercised by the people due to their general ignorance of law and also
>> because it was not developed into an implementable form with a delivery
>> mechanism and system.
>>
>> Slowly over the years the pressure for transparency in governance and
>> accountability in administration increased to a very high level. The
>> enactment of the Right to Information Act eased some direct stress on the
>> government by giving an outlet to people to seek reasons for their
>> problems.
>>
>> This Act gave us sky high hopes, by fooling us into believing, that our
>> elected representatives, our lawmakers were serious and sincere about
>> bringing about positive changes in the way they govern us.
>> However, the future it projected in terms of transparency was too good to
>> be
>> true. But tormented as one was like the rest of the country by the
>> indignities that were heaped on us by the corrupt and corrupting
>> government,
>> one decidedto go with the flow of wide eyedoptimism the Act's passage
>> generated.
>>
>> Having foundthis ultimate panacea of all our ailments we enthusiastically
>> embarked upon a community effort of spreading awareness about it. Training
>> camps were organized on how to write an RTI application, how to file the
>> first appeal, how to file a complaint or second appeal. We went from
>> office
>> to office to find out who were the Public Information Officers and whether
>> appellate authorities were appointed or not. Even a preliminary general
>> survey of different offices filled us first with despair because we found
>> that hardly any of the offices had taken it seriously. Either the PIOs
>> were
>> not appointed or they themselves denied the knowledge of being the PIO of
>> the particular department. Our despair slowly turned to hope when we saw
>> that our enquiries stirred the sleeping system and soon enough the PIOs
>> were
>> to be found in their respective offices. In the beginning there was
>> initial
>> resistance in the departments to receiving and processing the
>> applications. But a sustained effort by a large number of applicants and
>> pressure from some organized groups like ours started wearing the
>> resistance down. It helped that the group had some very senior retired
>> bureaucrats working as volunteers. The media also gave priority coverage
>> to
>> any news concerning RTI and both the successes and failures were magnified
>> to draw attention of the people and the government.
>>
>> The first shock came when the U.P. Government appointed the State Chief
>> Information Commissioner and the Information Commissioners. Alarm bells
>> started ringing in our minds. The appointments raised serious questions
>> about how seriously the government of Uttar Pradesh had taken the
>> implementation of the Act in letter and spirit. The government of the day
>> treated this law with the same casual contempt as it had treated other
>> institutions and instruments of governance. The Commission was doomed to
>> become a defunct court like the consumer courts, the Bar Council and the
>> Press Council etc. The post of commissioners became choices for
>> rewardingfriendly journalists, sycophants and loyal bureaucrats. Although
>> the writer of this column raised the alarm during the meetings of our
>> group
>> unfortunately no one saw the writing on the wall. The damage was done. The
>> Commission was crippled before it could take even baby steps in the
>> direction of enforcing the Right to
>> Information Act.
>>
>> In this bleak scenario some stray incidents took place preventing the
>> fluttering flame of hope from sniffing out. As a result of group efforts
>> and
>> also due to some extent his ill luck, we managed to get the SCIC suspended
>> from office for misconduct. The Supreme Court put its seal on his fate.
>> Barring that lone exception, we could not prevent the government from
>> making
>> further appointments in total violation of the norms and procedure and in
>> clear contradiction of the provisions of the RTI Act.
>>
>> The public by and large is in the same ambivalent state of despair and
>> hope.
>> Some front rung leaders of the movement realize their folly and admit in
>> private the failure of the experiment. While all our hopes and aspirations
>> from the RTI Act have not been fulfilled it has provided succor and
>> courage
>> to many. There is already a sizeable number of cases where the sustained
>> use
>> of RTI has resulted in the corrupt being shamed or punished, some opening
>> up
>> of government systems and information even if forced by the courts, of
>> creating a fear in the officialdom.
>>
>> NAVEEN TEWARI
>> (The author is the State Convener of U.P. Right to Information Campaign,
>> National Alliance of People's Movements - NAPM. Email: nct.lko@gmail.com)
>>
>> -------------------
>> Published in: The Hindustan Times, 13 October 2011
>> -------------------
>
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>