Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] RTI First Appeal u/s 19 of RTI Act

Once the information is provided, the applicant is within rights to publish it.
the high court order is attached. please to to para 25.

On 11/10/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> The Appellate Authority, PMO
>
> Date: 09.Nov.2011
>
> Sir:
>
> Sub: First Appeal against RTI reply no. RTI/3832/2011-PMR dated 19.Oct.2011.
>
> Kindly decide my appeal against the above mentioned RTI reply issued by
> Sanjukta Ray made on the following distinct grounds set out below without
> prejudice to each other.
>
> 1) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to issue me a "third party" notice u/s 11 of
> RTI Act, for which he/she deserves to be penalised for providing the
> information to the aplicant without due notice to me.
>
> 2) FOR the Ld. CPIO has corruptly provided 1 page of information free of
> charge to the applicant (a habitual RTI misuser) and thereby deprived the
> State of prescribed revenue and for which the CPIO deserves to penalised.
>
> 3) FOR the Ld. CPIO has failed to initate prosecution under the Official
> Secrets Act against the applicant for publishing information obtained under
> RTI process over the media and internet and thereby disclosing state
> secrets to foreigners and other persons inimincal to the Indian State, and
> for which the CPIO deserves to be prosecuted.
>
> Prayer:
>
> A) That suitable directions be issued on my Appeal after hearing me in
> person on adeqaute notice to attend.
>
> And for which kindness the appellant shall be ever grateful as duty bound.
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
> (Appellant)
>
> Address: B-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024.
> Tel: 011-24334262
>


--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.