Re: [rti4empowerment] Fwd: KARNATAKA INFORMATION RTI RULE AMENDMENTS

Pdf file not found, can u pl. attach and resend it.

PVK

On 09/11/2011, SHASHI KUMAR.A.R. <rudreshtechnology@gmail.com> wrote:
> *DEAR BROTHERS & SISTERS ,*
> *FOR KIND ATTENTION *
> *
> *
> *KARNATAKA GOVT ISSUED AN GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 22/10/11 , ENCLOSED
> THE PDF VERSION , NOW THE KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION IS REFUSING THE
> COMPLAINTS FILED BY THE RTI APPLICANTS UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF THE RTI ACT
> AND KIC OFFICIALS ARE DIRECTING ALL THE RTI APPLICANTS NOT FILE ANY
> COMPLAINTS UNDER SECTION 18 (1) OF THE ACT , BUT THEY ARE DIRECTING RTI
> APPLICANTS TO FILE 1ST APEAL UNDER SECTION 19 (1) OF THE ACT BEFORE THE
> RESPECTIVE PUBLIC APPELATE AUHTHORITIES AND THEN ONLY ALL THE APPLICANTS
> MUST FILE 2ND APPEAL UNDER 19(3) OF THE ACT BEFORE KARNATAKA INFORMATION
> COMMISSION , *
> *ONE OF THE OFFICIAL SAID SECTION 18 IS SCRAPPED *
> *
> *
> *I AM REQUESTING EVERY CITIZEN /ACTIVIST / SOCIAL WORKER / RTI USER TO
> EXAMINE THE GAZETTE AND PLEASE GIVE VALUABLE COMENTS , WHETHER THIS RULE
> MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT IS VALID AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE RTI ACT ? *
> *AFTER SIX YEARS OF LAPSE ALSO MOST OF THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS DONT
> WANT RTI ACT TO BRING TRANSPARENCY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THIER OFFICES AND
> NOT INTERESTED TO IMPLEMENT SECTION 4(1) A & B OF THE ACT WITH GREAT
> SPIRIT *
> *MOST OF THEM DONT KNOW WHAT IS MEANT BY PIO AND THEY HAVE NOT APPOINTED
> APPLELATE AUTHORITY ALSO , *
> *THIS IS THE TRICK PLAYED BY KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION WHO ARE
> RETIRED BUREAUCRATS TO SUPRESS THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION TO SIT IDLE
> AND TO GET THE AROUND 1.5 LAKSH SALARY AND OTHER BENIFITS , PRIVILAGES
> , CAR , PERKS ETC , *
> *THEY DONT WANT TO HEAR AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT UNDER SECTION
> 18 OF THE ACT , AND ACTIVISTS NEED THE ACT TO EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION IN THE
> STATE , **EALIER KARNATAKA IS A SILICON CITY NOW IT BECOME SILICON HUB
> FOR CORRUPTION ,*
> * DAY BY DAY RTI ACT IS BECOMING DILUTE , EARLIER CHIEF INFORMATION
> COMMISSIONER KK MISHRA RECOMONDED FOR ONE SUBJECT AND 150 WORDS , NOW THIS
> IS THE SITUATION , IF THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 18 (1) OF THE ACT IS
> NOT HEARD , WHAT IS THE NECESSARY OF SIX INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS , NOW
> SOME OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER IS HEARING MORNING SESSION ONLY ABOUT
> 10 TO 12 COMPLAINTS AND SOME OF THEM HEARING MORE THAN 25 WITHIN 1 HOUR ,
> SOME OF THEM ARE NOT SPENDING MORE THAN FRACTION OF SECOND TO DISPOSE THE
> COMPLAINTS , AFTER NOON NO HEARINGS , BUT EACH INFORMATION COMMISSIONER IS
> GETING EQUAL TO HIGH COURT JUDGES SALARY BUT WHAT IS THE PROGRESS AND OUT
> PUT FROM THEM TO THE CITIZENS *
> *
> *
> *WITH REGARDS *
> *
> *
> *ARS KUMAR , B.E. LLB , MA JOURNALISM [ MA HUMAN RIGHTS ]SOCIAL ACTIVIST &
> JOURNALIST *
> *SWAMY VIVEKANANDA RTI JANA JAGRUTHI MISSION *
> *KARNATAKA
> *
>

--
---------------------------------------------------------
Pralhad Kachare
Director, Center for Public Policy,
YASHADA, Rajbhavan Complex,Baner Road, Pune-411007.02025608146, 9422750464