Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Is corruption "good" and to be encouraged

no cancer or any disease is good for the body,any way the small one will increase n finally kill the body.so is the corruption in any form even small will spread n kill the nation.this disease has increased to a uncontrollable proportion n must be checked n cured immediately.

From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, 19 April 2012 9:31 AM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: Is corruption "good" and to be encouraged

Dear Vijay

A very pertinent question which I am responding to.

The human body is filled with "unclean", "bad", "poisonous" (ie.
"corrupt") substances.
The human being thrives / flourishes / grows BECAUSE of these
substances which are NECESSARY BY-PRODUCTS of growth.

A "cancer" is "unrestrained" growth. If detected in time, it can  be
surgically removed.

So Yes, a small amount of cancer can be tolerated / managed if growth
continues.

Sarbajit

On Apr 19, 8:00 am, Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kap...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would like to pose a counter question: Is a certain amount of cancer good?
> Regards,Victor
>
> --- On Wed, 4/18/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [HumJanenge] Is corruption "good" and to be encouraged
> To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 5:24 PM
>
> What folows is based on a story publ;ished in "The Week" magazine last month
> In a nutshell.
> 1) Gen. V.K.Singh has left the Indian Army in a shambles and unable to fight even a 2 day war with China.
>
> 2) He has done this for his personal goals (at the instigation of his family members)3) He has draped himself in the cloak of a corruption fighter and thereby ensured that no important file for procurement of vital supplies desperately needed by the Army was processed. In fact even files already approved were reopened.
> 4) The net result is that the majority of SERVING officers are bitterly opposed to CoAS V.K.Singh whereas the veterans (IESM) seems to back him.
> In this background (and considering that enough information has emerged from both sides), can we discuss the larger question
>
> A) Is a certain amounty of corruption acceptable to ensure that "things get done" (ie. speed money). ??
> Sarbajit