Re: [IAC++] Know your new IAC team

Dear Shailyji

If you can post to this list, you can unsubscribe from the list
automatically also.
Let us also squarely address your query of if this is a "fake" IAC list or not.

1. Who is the first identifiable owner of "India Against Corruption" banner. ?
That would appear to be sometime in 1973-4 or so, in pleadings filed
in Allahabad High Court as a front organisation of Hindustan
Republican Association. Prashant Bhushan who has written a book on the
Indira Gandhi cases should certainly be expected to know about this
case and the name of the organization, and why Arvind did not launch
as IAC-Party on 2nd October..

2. On Oct 2 when Team-Arvind said they would float a party they had
already decided the name of Aam Aadmi Party - in fact the website was
booked the next day in USA by AID (a CIA front). Team-Anna had already
been told that IAC was not for them, and they would have to use BVJA
only - On Oct 4 Anna blogged accordingly. IAC was being retained by
HRA.

3. After HRA took over IAC and set up the mailing list and the interim
website, the matter reached the press with allegations of "Parallel
IAC" etc. Second rung leadership was not aware that IAC was staying
with HRA. It was only then that Kiran Bedi rushed down to Ralegan
Sidhi and emotionally blackmailed an ailing and half blind Anna into
"reclaiming" the IAC name. Professional parasites like Kiran Bedi and
Shivendra Singh Chauhan realised that without IAC banner they are
nothing.

4. You are correct that the new IAC is going to disturb. Isn't that
what we all want ?

Sarbajit

On 11/26/12, CyberTec Solutions <shailyji@gmail.com> wrote:
> you cannot discontinue even if this is a fake IAC list. cos they are here
> to disturb you and confuse you.
>
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, ashutosh singh
> <pratap.ashutosh@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to know is this the official mailing list of IAC Movement or a
>> fake
>> list. Please let me know so that I can decide if I wish to continue being
>> on the list or not.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ashutosh.
>>