Re: [HumJanenge] M L SHARMA, CENTRAL INFO COMMISSIONER PREFERS COMPENSATION OVER PENALTY

Try contempt of Court in respect of Orders in WP 10787-10788 in SC of India N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Mon, 25/2/13, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: [HumJanenge] M L SHARMA, CENTRAL INFO COMMISSIONER PREFERS COMPENSATION OVER PENALTY To: "RTI Act 2005 Hum Janenge Forum People's Right to Information" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Monday, 25 February, 2013, 4:09 PM PIO, Delhi Cantt. Board has not given any information to the applicant for over 100 days till date, even not attended the hearing at CIC pleading illness. FAA reportedly took on action on first appeal.  Central Information Commissioner Shri M L Sharma just imposed compensation of Rs. 2000/- payable to the applicant though it was a fit case for imposition of penalty. In the past, the PIO has not replied to RTIs of other applicants.   Penalty is deducted from the pay of the PIO while the compensation goes from govt. exchequer. Why such lienency on the erring PIOs by the CIC? In such cases, what is the suitable course of action. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.