Thursday, October 24, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

It is not the implementation of various legislators are the problem in this country , there are kinds of litigations which required to be taken out of courts ,,for example matrimonial disputes ..  what the role of the court in such kind of cases .  the solutions in matrimonial cases are two either to continue with the marriage or separation ... without going to this moot questions courts are burdened with matrimonial cases .. 5 to 10 cases between same parties ,,, right from magistrate courts to supreme Courts,, local lawyers to highly paid lawyer of supreme court depends upon the capacity of the clients,, even in 489 A bail or anticipatory bails days long arguments in supreme court and high courts ,,,,, what for ? finally what is going to be decided ? we have such confusing and unambiguous laws, we have dowry prohibition act, domestic voilance act   only to help lawyers ,,, ..... "U can remove the thrown with a small needle but u are trying to do it with hoe" that is the problem in our country ,,,, Matrimonial, tenancy, service labour matters can be decided without any lengthy hearing  or interpretation of law ,, but it is being confused and confused by lawyers class with an intention to grab money ...





On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Nainesh Dolas <naineshdolas@yahoo.com> wrote:
all my dear friends,

according to me for the trail mail issue is one and same  in all HC and SC Public Interest Litigations is pendency is very high .for that issue in respected HC and SC separate PIL  has to file , about that the court should fixed the norm for hearing the at least PIL on time basis .
some court  has also  fixed the fine charges for PIL maker /(petitioner )up to some lakhs .  
at present there are procedure which follow in court is after filling the PIL the concerned is taking 1) production
                              2) Circulation .
The concerned person who is smart in process he get the chance to pursue his PIL in court very fast and other are is in big "Q" for their PIL to come on board. 
 
Lets friends though who are with my view pl. contact so we can start the movement for the issue as mentioned in above Para.
 

Regards,

N.Doals
(M) 9869256740.






From: Col Shivraj <colshivraj@gmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; Forum for Fast Justice <fastjustice@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 5 October 2013, 22:39
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

Hon'ble Sureshan Ji,
You have also expressed your anger inside you but have not offered a solution.
You are an esteemed Advocate and can offer some easily executable short term and long term solutions. 
Pl use internet and force the authorities to accept your suggestions as has been done for the RTI amendments as well as the famous Bill / Ordinance.
We are with you and will get you an All India Support.
regards 
Col Shivraj
210 Munirka Vihar
New Delhi-110067
Phone: 26102999
Mob: 9810433842
http://www.google.com/profiles/colshivraj.
http://www.facebook.com/poster.hatao
MY DELHI , POSTER and NOISE FREE DELHI


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:28 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This is the visible decease in our country ,, but no body wants to discus at length. if u tried to find out reasoning for such delay u will reach to conclusion that our governing system is based upon some outdated principles which  without any basis and support of logic or reasoning ,, unless and until u  fight for change in the existing system nothing will work ,, I hope various sectors are slowly recognizing this fact .....  


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Forum for Fast Justice <fastjustice@gmail.com> wrote:


OVERSTRESSED LITIGANT COLLAPSES IN THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

MY 16 YRS OLD PIL HEARD FIRST TIME: TERMED IRRELEVANT NOW AND DISPOSED OF.


It was Friday 3-30 P.M. 27th Sept. 2013.


Bench : Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud and Justice M.S.Sonak.


I was waiting for my matter to reach for hearing and a big thud was heard from the chair just behind me. The full court room rose on its feet and looked behind. Judges got up and came down.


What happended?


A man collapsed with his chair upside down. Judges left for a while to their chambers. People around turned to help. Doctor was summoned from High Court clinic. Registrar General was standing tense. Patient was in coma. It took 20 minutes for the doctor to bring him back to the senses. Judges came to soothe him. He was crying with folded hands before the judges in prayer posture who couldn't assure him when his matter would be heard. They appeared helpless. Judges went out for few minutes and resumed work again. Meanwhile I asked the unfortunate litigant: 'Since How many years are you fighting you case?' 'six years' replied the man still crying while being taken out.


Immediately thereafter my PIL No. 902 of 1998 reached and I started argument. I was interrupted by the bench stating that my PIL on the irregularities and corruption in junior college admissions was based on 1997 GR (Government Resolution) and subsequently several judgements of the Supreme Court were pronounced on the subject, hence my PIL couldn't be entertained.


I was appearing in person and said that I could argue the matter in lieu of those judgements and justify every contents and prayers in the petition and prepared to take the utmost risk even at the cost of its dismissal. I said I was not at fault in delay of 16 long years! But the judges prevailed on their stand and 'allowed' me to file another PIL! I argued in vain that it involved lot of reworking and receiving info. through RTI and waiting for days and days for the information to be received. Judges said, they couldn't help. I further submitted that during last 16 years I would have urged hundred times to all Chief Justices to hear this PIL but in vain.


My heart cried from within for not geting justice to the poor and merited students but judiciary as usual stood insensitive.


If this is the fate of the Public Interest Litigations what about private and government litigations pending since 20-30 years in almost all courts across the country?


WILL INDIAN CITIZENRY RISE IN REVOLT?


(Bhagvanji Raiyani)

Chairman & Managing Trustee

Forum For Fast Justice

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in








Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
P. Sureshan,
Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India, 
NLC( India ) Law Office
No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph: 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.