To: indiaresists <email@example.com>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections
There is a vast body of case law on the subject.
In short, the term "include" is used to ENLARGE the language of the statute, and it usage is ordinarily not construed/restricted as "means" (as you have used it).
Today when an NRI cannot vote from outside India, the question of his donating money from outside for political activity is excluded equally. We saw very well what happened during the Khalistani, Naga, Tamil etc. separatist movements which were foreign funded by NRIs to wage war against the Indian State. As patriots we cannot permit this and neither should we defend such dangerous propositions.
The use of the wotd include further show that if a foreign citizen had to be expressly included an Indian Citzen resident outside India could not be deemed to be included just by implication.Nobody can have the least doubt in the matter.
Sent from my iPad
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/