Sunday, June 7, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING


These planks are good for winning votes but in the end wat matters is dat 'every Indian should have food on their plates.'
But this to salute ur good sentiment shri nag ji.
Wish this cld be true.

And Shri Malhotra ji has said right that population control is most imp in today's scenario of limited resources.

Our Respected Judiciary set the guidelines but it is for us to put it in practice.

Today in the papers that Delhi govt has allowed pv test on rape victims inspite of Court Guidelines.

On 8 Jun 2015 07:56, "Hirak Nag" <hiraknag@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
The statement 'When people lose faith in (our) judiciary, consequences can be alarming' is highlighting another serious concern supposedly afflicting our governance, but is this not another reflection on our thinking ? We must first give serious thought to our own deficient thinking and actions, each and every one of us, before shooting off our mouths to blame 'someone' else. Do right, do good, don't lie, don't cheat, and hear I would like to repeat my advise, ' Care for your sisters, live clean, think honest, do honest.' Only those who think honest and do honest can critisize misdemeanours.--------Hirak Nag.
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 6/6/15, ravindra malhotra <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
 To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>, "R N Goil" <rngoil@yahoo.com>
 Date: Saturday, 6 June, 2015, 12:10 AM

 After 1977, no law maker has been
 able to gather courage even to mention about family planning
 in any forum - probably not even in private. Production
 level being much higher in lower income groups, the number
 of people below poverty line keeps on  increasing,
 government being forced to control the figure by
 manupulating the threshold level of Poverty..

 R.N.Malhotra

 --------------------------------------------
 On Fri, 6/5/15, R N Goil <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
 wrote:

  Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY ,
 CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
  To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
 <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  Date: Friday, June 5, 2015, 11:36 AM

  Let us
  have the courage to follow 1 child norm like China for 20
  years to solve most of our ills. RN
  Goil

    



      On Friday, 5 June 2015 1:54 AM,
 Gaur J K
  <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
 wrote:
  
    

  

  #yiv3486396644 #yiv3486396644 --
   .yiv3486396644hmmessage P
  {
  margin:0px;padding:0px;}
  #yiv3486396644  body.yiv3486396644hmmessage
  {
  font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;}
  #yiv3486396644
  03/06/15
  A PIL was filed in the Suprme Court
  in 2008 seeking speedy justice by some NGOs. After a
 period
  of 6 years the Court has  summarily disposed of the
  petition in December 2014.
  To clear the
  mounting backlog of cases in different courts and to
 ensure
  that the backlog does not reappear a number of submissions
  were made for increasing the strength of the judges,
 filling
  up of the existing vacancies in subordinate courts, create
  addl. infrastructure facilities including greater
  transparency and accountability. The court observed that
 the
  judiciary has alrrady considered most of the issues raised
  in the petition indepndently and finally. Janhit Manch(
 Mr.
  Rayani) is one of the petitioners.So where is the
  hope for improvement in the justice delivery
  system?JKGaur
  Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015
  10:15:55 +0530
  From: deegees11@gmail.com
  To: trident142@yahoo.co.in
  CC:
  truevalue_pandian@yahoo.com;
 iyer_ga@yahoo.com;
  rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in;
 vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com;
  j_nc2000@yahoo.com;
 indiaresists@lists.riseup.net;
  Janshakti@yahoogroups.com;
 barkha@ndtv.com
  Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN
  JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING

  IAC was started by Kejriwal and
  now it has been hijacked by BJP morons.
  On 1 June 2015 at 09:47,
  capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in>
  wrote:
  its We the People
  who have to oversee the judges through live telecast of
  court proceedings.
  presently applicable colonial rules IPC/CrPC  
  the judges have too much discretion, as was designed for
  Britishers. must be harshly limited.
  since the judges are also
  servants of We the People.   
  if we see how law is made then we must also
  see how that law is applied.  therefore I  have been
  requesting President and  CJI  to start live telecast of
  SC  proceedings. only dishonest judges will object.

  rgds.
  beniwal 


       On Sunday, 31 May
  2015 9:12 PM, PANDIAN Paulraj <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  wrote:
      

   It is NOT our intention to
  blame any one or any individual or the system. WE ARE
  CONFUSED. One judge says GUILTY. The same case, same
  accused, same arguments, another more experienced, more
  knowledgeable judge is saying NOT GUILTY. Who is wrong and
  who is right? It can not be brushed aside as awn
 aberration.
  Both are presenting 800 plus pages of reasoning to
  substantiate their conclusions. Obviously one of them is
  wrong. I am personally scared when my case comes up for
  judgment who will try me and with what result? Added to it
  is the immunity granted to the judiciary by itself. But
 then
  who will oversee the judiciary? The Politicians? That is
 the
  joke of the millennium. Regards.

  Gopalkrishnan iyer <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>
  wrote:

  Simply
  put, naxalism, terrorism etc. are the offshoots of loosing
  faith in judiciary! One can find well educated people(if
  education is important) resorting to extremism/rebellion!
  Discrimination, deprivation, disparity are all leading to
  extremism!! Governance should incorporate all attributes
  that give rise to the above to be evened out!
    


       On Sunday, 31 May
  2015 7:50 AM, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>
  wrote:
      

    Dear
  Sir,Till date our Constitution has not define the
  word Citizen of India.Citizenship Act,1955 has
  not yet been accepted by Government of India and the State
  Governments.The judges are not law
  makers.How many people of this country has signed
  the documents called Citizen of India format designed by
 the
  bureaucracy.It was proposed in the year
  2004.Therefore please do not blame the
  judiciary. 

  Warm regards,
     Rakshpal
  Abrol
  Consumer Activist
  9820203154
  rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in

        
  From: PANDIAN
  Paulraj <truevalue_pandian@Yahoo.com>

  To: vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com

  Cc: Gopalkrishnan iyer
  <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>;
  Dr. NC Jain <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>;
  indiaresists@lists.riseup.net;
  Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>;
  Janshakti <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>;
  Barkha Dutt <barkha@ndtv.com>

   Sent: Saturday, 30 May
  2015 10:30 PM
   Subject: Re: [IAC#RG]
  WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
  ALARMING
    
  Remember. In India LAW simply means
       Leave Accused if Wealthy.
  It does not stop with actors, politicians
  bureaucrats and the like. It is not the mistake
  of the judges. Advocates should not take up cases they
 know
  to be unjust or illegal. Finding a way to somehow save
 their
  client is not fair. They no doubt save the client; but in
  that process ruin the moral fibre of the nation. The only
  way a common man can show his displeasure is by social
  boycott. If you do not agree with the let away culprit,
  don't see his movies for ever; or don't buy the
  product the cricketer endorses ; or don't vote for the
  party the politicians belong to. Ganga may not be cleaner
 by
  then. The country will become cleaner.

  Vijay Kapoor <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  wrote:

  >In this context,
  the recent order by SC as reported in the media, that a
  "judge" who has passed an absurd order cannot be
  questioned, is even more absurd. Question then arises:
 that
  if the "judge"  even in an absurd order cannot be
  questioned, can a judge who passes a criminal order, say,
  "go and shoot Mr. X" or "go and commit
  rape" or "burn down the house" can also not
  be brought to book !? Then can an absurd "judge"
  who passes an order, say, "I hereby sack the President
  of India" or "The parliament stands
  dissolved" be not brought to book ?
  >The judges need to ponder the deleterious
  effects on the nation of their virtually complete
  accountability.
  >
  >Regards,
  >
  >--------------------------------------------
  >On Wed, 5/20/15, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>
  wrote:
  >
  > Subject:
  Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY ,
  CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
  > To:
  "Gopalkrishnan iyer" <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>,
  "Dr. NC Jain" <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>,
  "vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com"
  <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com>,
  "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 1:04 AM
  >
  > The system was
  > evolved taking into consideration of
  British
  > laws.Most of the Advocates
  follow
  > the same and being influenced
  the judges pass the
  > order.The
  > Justice is never delivered it is
  purchased.  
  > Warm regards,   
  > Rakshpal Abrol
  >
  Consumer Activist
  > 9820203154
  > rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in
  >
  >      
  >  From: Gopalkrishnan
  >
  iyer <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  >
  > To: Dr. NC Jain
  > <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>;
  > "vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com"
  > <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com>;
  > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>

  >  Sent: Tuesday, 19 May
  > 2015 3:22 PM
  > 
  Subject: Re: [IAC#RG]
  > WHEN PEOPLE LOSE
  FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
  > ALARMING
  >   
  > There is
  > no doubt
  left as to the fact that Indian justice system is
  > not free from influence from powers that
  be, money power and
  > high profile
  advocates.The recent verdicts one after the
  > other seeng Salman khan virtually a free
  man within hours
  > despite being
  convicted is ample proof that justice delivery
  > is maneovreable! Harish Salve's
  presense in the court in
  > a way subdued
  the Justice!! Or else all those involved in
  > deliberating whether Salman is a culprit
  or not are  not at
  > all knowing the law
  on which they argued for 13 years! 
  >
  Jayalalitha'scase too is anopther instance cite!  Can
  a
  > common man avail the services of
  Salve or the like of him
  > and if so at
  what cost and how fast! Common man has to wait
  > for months for an appontment where as all
  appointments were
  > cancelled and flew
  down in Salmans case!!I should
  > say the
  justice system also is influenced by status of
  > people involved!
  >
  > Insider
  > trader Gupta
  in the US was convicted in a matter of days and
  > sentence followed in the same pace whereas
  Harshad
  > Mehta's case is far from
  being over though the accused
  > passed
  away long back!
  > I think the jury
  system
  > could speed up the justice
  system with least chance of a
  > faulty
  delivery of justice
  >
  > 
  >
  >
  >   
  >
  >   On Monday, 18 May
  2015 12:47 PM, Dr.
  > NC Jain <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  wrote:
  >    
  >
  >  Dear
  > sir    
  > Such instances are very common.As everone
  is aware, justice
  > delayed is justice
  denied and In India, it is a common
  >
  practice in almost,most department. I have a case of
  > noncompliance of CIC order for the last 4
  years and cic is
  > not replying/taking
  any action on it. In short,India is free
  > but not Indians.We have to struggle to
  make Indians free.
  > Dr
  > N C Jain 
  >
  >
  >      On Friday,
  May 15, 2015 1:14 AM,
  > Vijay Kapoor
  <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  wrote:
  >    
  >
  >  In
  > theory there
  appeals are possible to set right the wrongs of
  > lower courts. But things are entirely
  different in
  > practice.
  > I cite a couple of my own
  > experiences:
  >
  > 1.  I filed a
  >
  consumer complaint against a leading industrialist and
  > builder of Goa in the State Consumer
  court. The
  > "president judge",
  one Mr. Nelson Britto,
  > apparently held
  the case in my favour because he granted me
  > penal damages of Rs. 3.0 lacs against the
  builder. But look
  > at the sheer
  malafides of the "judge" and his
  > "order", who apparently imposed
  the penalty as a
  > smokescreen to shield
  AND REWARD the errant industrialist.
  >
  His entire order does not mention a single word as to why
  he
  > imposed the penalty, and whether the
  builder was in
  > deficency, in unfair
  trade practices, and providing
  >
  hazardous services, WHEN the industrialist-builder has
  lied
  > under oath and put a false
  document said to be the NOC from
  > navy
  in the agreement to sell; the builder admitted in
  > cross-examination under oath in that he
  destroyed evidence;
  > that he never
  obtained the mandatory NOC from navy; that the
  > brochure placed on record by me was his
  brochure; that he
  > contravened
  >  Registration Act; that he
  > contravened The Transfer of Property Act
  by not disclosing
  > material defects in
  the property; etc. and so on. There is a
  > contravention of at least half a dozen
  major Acts and laws
  > of the land. But
  the "judge" does not discuss any
  > of the law points involved and does not
  utter a single word
  > about all those.
  Finally to cap it all the "judge"
  > ignores the prayers made by me to either
  give market value
  > (with written
  quotations from 5 vicinity builders) OR a
  > similar flat in nearby locality. Instead
  he gives interest @
  > 15%, which means a
  loss in capital value to me of over 10
  >
  lacs (excluding interest cost), and a corresponding gain
  to
  > the industrialist.
  >
  > 2.  In
  > another case in the same court the
  "judge", one
  > Mr.
  Prabhudessai, who claims to be a law teacher in a local
  > college, ignores all evidence on record
  and several points
  > of law raised: Can
  the opposite party submissions that are
  >
  not on affidavit and are merely verbal, be entertained by
  > the court; Can a piece of paper without an
  Invoice Number /
  > Tax registration,
  taxes be a valid "Invoice /
  >
  Bill"; can the OP who has approached the court in
  not
  > good faith be entertained; when
  there are 6 different
  > agreements
  between the parties and with different dates and
  > terms & conditions, can the matter be
  properly decided
  > without first deciding
  which of the agreements is the valid
  >
  one; when the OP himself does not dispute or refute the
  > evidence placed on record, can the
  "judge"
  > unilaterally decide
  differently that too without any
  >
  reasoning; can the "judge" overrule at least 10
  SC
  > judgments on different subjects; can
  the "judge"
  > overrule the law
  and the intent to
  >  the
  > parliment; can the "judge" order
  costs when
  > several issues of law have
  been raised; etc. The appeal
  > before the
  National Commission was the same  .......
  > non-appreciation of evidence on record and
  several  law
  > points raised. At this
  point as I came down with health
  >
  problems I could not pursue the matter in the SC.
  >
  > There are many fine
  judges (I
  > recall Justices Mr. Sachar
  and Mrs. Leila Seth, who settled
  > my PF
  case in just 4 hearings and did not allow the govt.
  > lawyers to dilly-dally. I also recall the
  justice in Delhi
  > HC, who put his foot
  down by telling the govt judges to get
  >
  on with their defence, if any, and the outcome was
  quaterly
  > disclosure of results by
  corporates, and also certain
  > provisins
  for transparency in results.) But, the problem is
  > all-persuasive, and is not limited to the
  judiciary only. As
  > the SC itself has
  said that the judges are part of the same
  > society. One hopes that one encounters the
  good judges,
  > babus, netas, of which
  there are many.
  >
  >
  There is need for ALL-ROUND reform as in
  > REFORM. The elections, administration,
  judiciary, police,
  > education, health,
  ... just everything.
  >
  > Regards,
  >
  >
  >
  --------------------------------------------
  > On Thu, 5/14/15, P.Mohana Chandran <p.mohanachandran50@gmail.com>
  > wrote:
  >
  >  Subject: Re:
  >
  [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY ,
  CONSEQUENCES
  > CAN BE ALARMING
  >  To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
  >  Date: Thursday, May 14, 2015, 1:08 AM
  > 
  >  Shri
  Venkataraman may
  >  kindly note that to
  err is human.Judges also
  > may err-of
  >  course not with the intention to
  > err.The error may be on a
  >  question of law
  > or
  on a guestion of fact.To take care of
  >

  > such situations,law enables affected
  party to file
  >  Appeal,Review,Revision
  etc.Do you wantthe
  > Appellate Court
  to
  >  confirm the trial court
  > judgement in all cases and thereby
  >  make the
  > people to
  have faith in judiciary.TrialCourt and
  >  Appellate Courts shall patiently hear
  the
  > matter and give
  >  judgements with out fear or
  > favour.They need not worry about
  >  the
  > comments that
  may be made by persons like
  >
  > Shri.Venkataraman.
  > 
  If the decision of
  > Mr.Justice
  Kumaraswamy of
  >  the Hon'ble
  > Karnataka High Court is based on
  erroneous
  >
  >
  calculation (mathematical error ) in calculating the
  > total
  >  assets and
  total income and if the
  > mismatch is
  really more
  >  than 10% as is
  > being propogated by some opposition
  leaders
  >
  >  in
  Tamilnadu, a mere Application  for Review will be
  >  sufficient for the Judge to  correct
  the
  > error.
  >  The
  allegation was that since
  > 
  Ms.Jayalalitha  is a politician,the case was
  > prolonged for
  >  more
  than a decade.On her
  > coviction,when the
  Bail matter
  >  came up
  > before the Supreme Court ,coditional Bail
  was
  >  granted,a consequence of which is
  expeditious
  > disposal  of
  >  the Appeal which resulted in
  > quick disposal of the
  >  Appeal.The economic
  >
  status of the party concerned has
  > 
  nothing
  > to do with the case.
  >  A resourceful /wealthy
  > party may be able
  > 
  to engage a team of legal
  > experts and
  may be able to come
  >  out
  > successful by taking advantage of the
  loopholes in law.A
  >  'daridra
  narayana' may have to depend
  > on a
  lawyer
  >  provided by Court or
   Legal
  > Services Authority who may
   or
  >  may not be
  >
  good/capable of handling the matter.It is only in
  >  this matter ,economically deprived
  persons are
  > in a dis
  >  advantageous position.Bail is the
  > Rule and Jail is an
  > 
  exception. Poor people
  > are not capable
  of engaging a lawyer
  >  and in
  > cases that are not very serious,amicus
  curie is not
  >  appointed by court for
  accused and hence they
  > remain in
  jail
  >  for days, months and  at
  > times years.
  >  I
  shall cite a case
  > (Mrs.Indirra
  Gandhi)
  >  where a High Court
  > 's verdict was set aside by the
  >  Supreme
  > Court,not
  because the High Court was wrong but
  > 
  because the Parliament amended the law with
  > retrospective
  > 
  effect.Incurring expenses by
  > a
  candidate above the cut off
  >  limit was
  an
  > electoral malpractice even if the
  amount is
  >
  > spent
  by a  political party. Mrs.Gandhi was unseated as
  >  Congress spent in excess of the cut
  off
  > amount.During
  >  emergency, law was amended
  > with retrospective effect
  >  stipulating that
  >
  money spent by political parties shall not
  >
  > be counted to
  calculate the cut off amount .Both the
  >  decisions were correct.Perhaps Shri
  >  Venkataraman might not have uttered a
  word
  > had
  > 
  Ms.Jayalalitha got the Prevention of
  >
  Corruption  Act
  >  amended with
  retrospective
  > effect exempting
  MPs,MLAs,MLCs
  >  and Central
  > and State Ministers from the per view
  of the
  >  Prevention of Corruption
   Act.I appreciate Ms
  > Jayalalitha
  >  for fighting the case by filing
  > Appeal engaging ,of course
  >  the best legal
  >
  brain instead of managing to  amend the
  >
  > Prevention of
  Corruption  Act with the help of Mr Modi
  > and
  >  also the
  DMK P.Mohana
  >
  >
  Chandran
  >  On Wed, May 13, 2015
  >  at 9:08 AM, Raghavan R N <raghavan6@hotmail.com>
  >  wrote:
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >  Dear Sir,
  >
  > If some one is  Punished by a Court, it
  does not
  >  mean Judiciary  is right .
  There are many
  > cases  pending
  >  Judgement  in a number of
  > Courts in india, the two recently
  >  came up
  > for public
  attention is that of Ms Jayalalitha and
  >  Mr Salman Khan
  > 
  Every one
  > knows that  Ms
  Jayalalitha's case
  >  is
  > one related to Politics and it is natural,
  every one
  >  wanted her to be punished[
  her opponents]. 
  > She has been an
  >  actress for a long time and
  > her back ground is too good to
  >  be
  > considered that
  she amassed wealth only by political
  > 
  means.  Judgement by a Lower Court need not
  > necessarily
  >  decide
  the final outcome. Law
  > provides more
  options  till
  >  Supreme Court.
  > If it is a fit case for fighting, Govt
  should
  >  initiate action to file a suit
  in Supreme
  > Court. None
  >  prevented and no one should
  > close this option. Counting
  >  dresses ,
  > chappals
  and other house hold articles for
  >
  >  estimating the assets of Ms Jayalalitha
  looks
  >  odd.
  >  In
  the case of Ms Salman
  > Khan, it can
  be
  >  appreciated that this case
  > is not of national importance.
  >  Daily such
  > run over
  cases happen in India and abroad and
  > 
  even yesterday three women were killed under
  > the wheels of a
  > 
  police vehicle. It is an
  > accident can
  be due to
  >  negligence.Here too,
  > the accused has options to
  >  appeal in higher
  >
  court to get justice. Bail was granted as
  >
  > he is an actor and
  is working in number of FILMS. All get
  >  affected. Granting bail , fast or slow
  cannot
  > be questioned.
  >  Definitely, prominent people
  > get things done fast and for
  >  others, it
  > takes
  time. It is Indian culture and way of doing
  >  things in India.  
  > 
  >  raghavan rn
  > 
  >
  >
  >  From: boompellivenkatrao@gmail.com
  >  Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:47:50 -0400
  >  To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
  >  Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE
  FAITH
  > IN JUDICIARY ,
  >  CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
  >
  ALARMING
  > 
  >  One
  more case of
  > SATYAM   Ramblings Raju.
  The fraud is
  >  a
  >
  open book to every one. He got bail with in a
  >  month. 
  >  B.
  VENKAT RAO
  >  Sent from my iPhone
  >  On
  > 12-May-2015, at
  3:41 am, Jagjit Ahuja <jagjit.ahuja@gmail.com>
  >  wrote:
  > 
  >
  > Judiciary in India
  has
  >  made a mockery of
  > themselves . They know that there is
   no
  >
  > one in the
  governing system who can punish them for all
  > the
  >  wrongs. Now
  with the judgement made in
  > favour of
  >  Jayalalitha clearly shows that
  > how our judiciary has been
  >  working . The
  >
  presenting officers and the defence
  >
  >  advocates have been playing games with
  each other .At
  >  least punish out off
   those who have been
  > proved to be
  >  wrong .
  >  Same
  > thing happened with the case of Salman
  >
  > Khan.
  >  On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:41 PM,
  > Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
  >  wrote:
  >  To
  >
  > India Against
  Corruption
  > 
  >
  >
  > 
  >
  >
                                                            
  >      WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN
  JUDICIARY
  >  , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
  ALARMING
  > 
  > 
  >  After
  > several
  years
  >  of trial in a killing case,
  > an actor was held guilty by the
  >  court and
  > jail
  term
  >  awarded. But, he got bail in
  a
  > few hours 
  > 
  from another judge. After
  > several years
  of trial in a
  >  corruption
  > case, a
  >  Chief
  Minister was found guilty and
  > awarded
  jail term and
  >  hefty fine. But,
  >  after a few months, a higher court
  judge
  > called her innocent
  >  and acquitted
  > 
  everyone involved totally. Now, one wonders
  > which judge is
  > 
  right and which judge
  >  is wrong.
  > 
  >
  > While rich
  > 
  politicians and cinema actors
  > seem to
  have the last laugh,
  >  there are
  > thousands
  >  of
  dharidhranarayanas in India
  > who stay in
  jail for lesser
  >  crime for
  > several
  >  years
  without being heard. Are they
  > not as
  much Indians as
  >  the cinema actor
  >  driving his car on a pavement dweller
  and rich
  > politician
  >  indulging in corrupt
  >  practices ? Are we settling down for
  this sort
  > of democracy
  >  in India ?
  >
  >
  >  An average common
  man
  >  in
  > India,
  millions of whom do not have any political
  >  affiliation have already
  >  lost
  > faith in the
  politicians in power and bureaucracy. He
  >  has been thinking that
  >  the
  > judiciary is
  ultimate conscience keeper of the country.
  >  But, when judiciary
  >  give
  > judgements
  with so much of contradiction between one
  >  judge and the other
  >  and
  >  providing
   bail and relief
  >  to the
  > convicted actor and
  > 
  politicians with
  >  great speed and
  with
  >   many judges in
  > India already having been
  >  accused of
  > corrupt
  practices in the past, people 
  >
  > tend to develop doubts about judiciary
  >
  > too.
  > 
  >  Now, what can
  a
  >  common man do , if he loses faith
  in
  > politicians in power,
  >  bureaucrats and
  > 
  judges? It is alarming to think about such
  > situation and the
  > 
  possibilities.
  >  N.S.Venkataraman
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >  Post:
  > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > 
  >  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  > 
  >  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  > 
  >  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  > 
  >  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  > 
  > 
  >  Post:
  > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  > 
  >  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  >  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  >  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  > 
  >  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  >  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  >                     
       
  > 
  > 
  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > 
  >  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  > 
  >  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  > 
  >  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  > 
  >  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  > 
  > 
  >
  > -----Inline
  Attachment Follows-----
  > 
  >  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  >  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  >
  >  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  >  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  >
  > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  >
  >    
  >
  > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  >
  > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  >
  >    
  >
  > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
  >
  > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
  >
  >   
  >
  >
  >Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  >Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  >Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  >Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  >WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

    


  
    
  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

      

  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



  Post:
  "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  Quit:
  "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
    
           
            

  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

    
      
  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

  Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
  Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
  Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

  Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
  WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
 -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

 Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
 Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
 Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
 Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
 WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.