Friday, January 30, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking:World Bank

SENIOR aDVOCAT6ES AND sOLICITORS FIRMS ARE TAKING ADJOUNMENTS FREQUENTLY .tHEY SHOULD BE STRICTLY PREVENTED. 

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:55 PM, ADV. SUDHA GANDHI <advsudhagandhi@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com> wrote:

On 27 January 2015 at 11:19, Holiday Bash International <lidder.hbi@gmail.com> wrote:
WE are the witness to injustice by High Court Judge . He just did not hear us Infact on the day of argument he gave his order before even our lawyer opened his mouth which means it was pre deceided the judgment .If there was a viedio clipping it would have been easy for us to prove in SC that our constitutional right has been violated .

Any way we will still try getting justice from SC
Amarjit
Pune

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:30 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

Not only in SC, this kind of thing happens in all courts. I have witnessed many such frauds by judges. It is surprising that later many such judges had been promoted or got post retirel positions. In re- video recording of court proceedings are concerned there is an international national commitment from the country and help offered from outside. ADR may have more information About this. Let some body from their side explain it. Purposefully our judiciary and politicians keeps silent about this commitment. If video recording of every proceedings takes place and a mechanism is made in place to deal with erring judicial officers, much problems can easily be solved.

On Jan 26, 2015 3:07 PM, "capt beniwal" <trident142@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Sir, I have been requesting to President and CJI to start live telecast of SC proceedings. when we can see live how a Law is made in parliament, then we want to see how that law is applied.
if a lower court commit an error it can be corrected by higher court but if the SC commit error , deliberately or otherwise, it can not be corrected and the litigant suffer for life. 

i personally saw in SC , when an ex military men pension case was heard, there was No ASG in court during hearing but in SC order, came few days later,  it was stated the ASG made the statement ( thats another point that quoted statement itself is incorrect misleading)  which became the basis of the order and that ex  fauji suffer, beside hundreds of similarly placed men.
ASG got the case settled in chambers.
Had there been recording/live telecast the two ex-judges would have dared to act dishonestly. soon after Both got next better appointments.
 
Today is age of e- governance.  Crores are spend on it.
If there is Rule of Law then Judges can not be allowed to behave like dictators.
To stop that attitude -   Live telecast/recording  is the answer.

rgds. beniwal


On Saturday, 24 January 2015 10:21 PM, Pankaj Rai <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:


 Your Lordship,

As a party in person who has argued a number of cases in High Court, I fail to understand two things. Admittedly, the number of Judges in India is much lower as compared to other countries in the West. However, what are the reasons whereby the Judiciary is reluctant in taking action against a litigant if he files false affidavits and tampered documents even in High Courts? Why don't High Courts start dismissing cases if people make dishonest pleadings and award exemplary costs? Will it not reduce the number of cases significantly if zero tolerance is shown to fraud? Why are orders not passed on applications of perjury?

The second question is whether the existing legal system will inspire confidence unless the Judiciary is made accountable and there is a mandatory recording of court proceedings especially in High Courts/Supreme Courts?

Kind regards,

Pankaj


Maj Pankaj Rai (Retd),


Cell: +91 99163 57115


On Saturday, 24 January 2015 11:59 AM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear All,
I do not hold brief for Judges nor I wish to defend the incompetent Judges.Exceptions are everywhere.I just wish to bring certain facts,as reported, to the notice of the readers.It may be known to many.
In America on every 10 Lakh citizens 125 Judges are available where as in India on 10 Lakh Citizens only 09 Judges are appointed.This figure shows that 
insufficiency of judges is one of the reason for delay in disposal of cases.
           In 2011 the High Court of Bombay notified to fill 100 vacancies but could fill up only 41.In 2012 out of 159 vacancies only 55 could be filled up.This means even if sanctioned strength is increased ,desired number of quality officers may not be available.Still effort is to be made.
            D.C.Verma
            Former Judge


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Verma,

Any increase in the number of judges without enforcing accountability and transparency will only be wastage of taxpayers' money. The ground reality is that our judiciary is a 10000 pc failure by the basic rule that justice delayed is justice denied. And is justice denied only through delay? Abs NOT! And why the delay and denial of justice? Incompetence, ignorance and arrogance of judges!

Amoung the three organs of our Constitution the law-makers are controlled by the people, bureaucracy (yes, bureaucracy, because without the active support of the bureaucracy no politician can do any wrong!) and finally the judiciary; the law-enforcers are also controlled by the law-makers and the judiciary. And then there are the ears and eyes of the people- the media waiting to sensationalise every news involving the misdemeanour of these authorities. Inspite of such strict supervision and control all that we can hear these days are about politician-bureaucrat-underworld nexus even though the fact remains that none, worth the name, from this unholy nexus have ever been punished by the holier-than-thou judiciary.

So now think how bad a system can be which is not only NOT subject to supervision but also kept beyond critical observation. Well isn’t our judiciary is just that? And do I need to recapitulate that quip: power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely?

Please read my blogs:




Lokpal or not- the judiciary needs to be disciplined first at 




ravi

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com> wrote:
For reform in judicial system Committee after Committee were formed but, except few ,in general, recommendations were not implemented.
It is well known that vacancies, from top court ,ie Supreme Court to lower subordinate courts ,are not filled up.Cases are piling up.
               Sanctioned strength of Judges is proportionately  insufficient for the cases already pending or to meet the new institutions.Even sanctioned strength is not filled up.This also leads to delay in decision.
                Increase in legislation ,increase in population,increase in peoples awareness for their rights,increase in strikes by members of the Bar,increase in seeking adjournments on various avoidable grounds are other reasons for increase in litigation.
                The sanctioned strength of Judges at all the levels is desired to be increased by four times with simultaneous increase in infrastructure.
                It is for the authorities & for policy makers to consider and take an early action.
D.C.Verma
Former Judge
                

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Dipak Shah <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
I can give you as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they are rattled by Justices . Are they taking oath for such doing business. Without having filed Affidavit in reply by Respondents , having served the notice, dismissed the cases taking own intuition of the subject matter.!!!!!
Relevance of the cases not related to the case under study!!!!
Recently Gujarat High Court has made a rule that Party In Person cannot appear in his case unless Special Committee takes interview and passes him to appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise he has to engage Advocate in his case. This is against fundamental rights of a person under Constitution.
I had seen one Advocate of one Justice loitering in the courts to canvass for doing favorable judgment !!!!
In one case Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made order immediately after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues office by Manmoihan Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I Office was afraud and cash counter to Grant hefty premiums over the share public issue.
Since the office is abolished the petition is dismissed. No Affidavit filed by Controller of Capital Issues!!! How the flow of water gate flows!!!! To fight with this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India by spending lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely. Attached Document, See also relevance of the names and Google Search all and every thing.
How the Cases are being handled. There is no supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you die.
Shah D J



On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 8:25 AM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:


I can give you as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they are rattled by Justices . Are they taking oath for such doing business. Without having filed Affidavit in reply by Respondents , having served the notice, dismissed the cases taking own intuition of the subject matter.!!!!!
Relevance of the cases not related to the case under study!!!!
Recently Gujarat High Court has made a rule that Party In Person cannot appear in his case unless Special Committee takes interview and passes him to appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise he has to engage Advocate in his case. This is against fundamental rights of a person under Constitution.
I had seen one Advocate of one Justice loitering in the courts to canvass for doing favorable judgment !!!!
In one case Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made order immediately after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues office by Manmoihan Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I Office was afraud and cash counter to Grant hefty premiums over the share public issue.
Since the office is abolished the petition is dismissed. No Affidavit filed by Controller of Capital Issues!!! How the flow of water gate flows!!!! To fight with this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India by spending lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely. Attached Documents, See also relevance of the names and Google Search all and every thing.
How the Cases are being handled. There is no supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you die.
Shah D J


On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 1:07 AM, Manohar Sharma <mspropertyresource@gmail.com> wrote:


I and in my circle has EXPERIENCED how petitions r NEGLECTED and time PASSED to get DEATH of CAUSE of PETITIONS 4 example one see WP @ M-HC/8508/2003.  

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:46 AM, sonico sharma sharma <sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

sir,
justice delayed is justice denied


Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:51:50 +0530
From: janhitmanch@gmail.com
To:
Subject: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank



Date : 17-01-2015

SPEED POST

BHAGVANJI RAIYANI

I AM ASHAMED OF OUR JUDICIARY
I AM ASHAMED OF OUR GOVERNMENT
I AM ASHAMED OF OUR PARLIAMENT

To,
1. Hon'ble Shri Pranab Mukherjee
The President of India,
2. Dr.Hamid Ansari
Hon'ble Vice President of India,
3. Mrs.Sumitra Mahajan
Hon'ble Speaker, Loksabha
4. Hon'ble Shri Narendra Modi,
The Prime Minister of India
5. Hon'ble Justice H.L.Dattu
The Chief Justice of India
6. Hon'ble Smt.Sushma Swaraj
Minister for External Affair
7. Hon'ble Shri D.V.Sadananda Gowda
Minister for Law & Justice

Please read The Times of India report dated 17-1-2015 as hereunder, captioned 'Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank finding: 'Ease of Doing Business'. India was ranked 142 among 189 countries last year. The World Bank suggested that there was an urgent need for reforms in the system of performance appraisal of judicial reforms.

We go on urging for your appointments to discuss judicial reforms but you never care to reply. Now we will be more aggressive (Gandhian ways) an pursuing the mission justice. We will take the issue before the UN and the comity of nations.

I dare you all to sue me if you feel I have defamed institutions or the dignitaries.

(Bhagvanji Raiyani)
Chairman & Managing Trustee
Forum For Fast Justice
09820403912
Kuber Bhuvan, Bajaj Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai – 400 056.
The Times of India report:
Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank.

NEW DELHI: Large pendency of cases in Indian courts and non-implementation of judicial reforms have been cited by the World Bank as one of the key reasons for India's low rank on the Bank's Index of 'Ease of Doing Business'. India was ranked 142 among 189 countries last year.

In a memorandum to the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) under the commerce ministry, the World Bank suggested linking judges' appraisal with reduction of pendency in courts. Sources said the matter was discussed at a meeting organized by the DIPP recently to refine the performance evaluation system of judges to link their performance to the resolution of specific bottlenecks as suggested by the World Bank.

The DIPP is also coordinating implementation of the 'Make in India' campaign of the Modi government.

Interestingly, the World Bank suggested that there was an urgent need for reforms in the system of performance appraisal of judicial officers in the country to bring about uniformity and infuse objectivity and standardization.

The Bank cited an example from Malaysia where implementation of a reform index for judges improved case disposal rates and reduced backlog by 50% in less than three years. Another example was cited from the United Arab Emirates, where rewards were instituted for the best performers.

According to the memorandum, the liberal grant of adjournments was an often cited reason for delays in court proceedings in India. It recommended monitoring the number of times judges granted adjournments and the reasons for granting them. "This can be done through case management systems and linked to performance management evaluations," it said.

It asked the government to ensure that adjournments were not indefinite by setting a time limit.

Just a few weeks ago, the Modi government had written to chief justices of all 24 high courts to ensure speedier settlement of commercial and other disputes for creating a conducive investment climate and success of 'Make in India' campaign.

"One of the reforms introduced by Malaysia between 2009 and 2011 during the overhaul of the judicial system was the implementation of a reform index for judges," the Bank said, citing how this index, fixed by the judges themselves, was aimed at allowing them to assess and monitor their performance. As a result of this and other measures, case disposal rates in Malaysian courts improved and backlog was reduced by 50% in less than three years, it said. 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Holiday Bash International.
Pune, India
Tel  : +91-20-66015020
Fax : +91-20-26055158
Mob : +91-9423582779; 9823012276
http://holidaybash.net
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Holiday-Bash-International/114429708650682
Alternate E-mail : contact@holidaybash.net
Inline image 1

Enjoy a Unique Travel Experience With Us


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


RE: [IAC#RG] PAIN OF LISTENING TO ENGLISH NEWS T V MEDIA ANCHORS

Dear Mr Gaur

You are absolutely right in your assessment of the media channels. These channels are all owned with sweeping stakes by global media moguls and yet all we get to see is "bizarre showdown" and "high decibel sensationalized cacophony" that is in stark contrast with the three news channels, named by you, where even the most "heart breaking" news and debates are presented with elan and poise that the situation deserves, considering the global ramifications.

Suffice it to say, our debates, if we should call them one, are "fully paid for", intimidating and base, at the least - if that is what the "Nation Wants To Know", with few exceptions of course!

Regards
Dharmesh Dutta

On Jan 27, 2015 11:14 PM, "Gaur J K" <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
27/1/15

Mr. Sharma
You are confusing the two issues-
1. discretionary control or veto power of the moderators on circulation of mails on this link i.e. indiaresists. If so Mr. S. Roy has already clarified the policy.
2. If this relates to moderators/anchors on TV debates which is under discussion, I wonder if anyone can clarify here. You should either direct it to the channel concerned or lodge it as a complaint with the Broadcasting Corp. of India as advised by the advrt. appearing in the channel broadcast.
For TV debates most of us feel they are sub-standard, lack in depth, are loaded in favour of the policy of the owners of the Channels, have their own set of people as participants whom they oblige through payments as participation fee etc.
But I ask a simple question- can there is a cheaper or more economical way to run the channels? Gathering news from different sources,locations is much more expensive than holdng  a debate in your
own studio. also is it not the reason that you hardly have any news about global happenings as reported in other channels like BBC or CNN o even Alzazira.
Regds
JKGaur


From: contactjps@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:14:11 +0530
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] PAIN OF LISTENING TO ENGLISH NEWS T V MEDIA ANCHORS

In continuation of my mail , just wish to know what discretionary control  or veto power , the moderators are ascribing to themselves on circulation / dissemination of mails.


JP Sharma
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Janardan Sharma <contactjps@gmail.com> wrote:
Fully agree that the quality and tenor of the discussions have deteriorated tremendously. Inclusion of the same set of people ,particularly from the political arena,who have no  track record of any worthwhile achievements or path breaking  vision but are mere spokesman on lease, is sheer wastage of air time.They only fan negativity and display lesser  standards of public debate and elocution than in an average level High School . In particular the congress spokesman , bereft of any ideas and and being defensive from the word go , perform in a pathetic manner. Surely there is no dearth of eminent scholars and performers whose every word will educate and inspire us and spread message of hope.

One can only hope that Media will do introspection and put in efforts to improve the quality of deliberations and discussions rather than give visibility to unworthy and irelevant people who need to be faded out so that the PM Modi and his Govt' efforts is given due recognition and acknowledgement



On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Atish Sharma <atish2810@gmail.com> wrote:
I fully agree with the observations regarding the news channel debates.
 Atleast one of the drawbacks mentioned can be set aside immediately by controlling the volumes of the speakers so that only one person only is allowed to be heard clearly while others can be heard with much reduced volume. This option may be controlled by the anchor on the basis of the time allotted to each speaker.
It will be upto the speaker if he wishes to utilise the allotted time meaningfully towards the basic  issue or waste the time aimlessly towards unwanted shouting.
Public is not receptive to high db bickering.

​-aks​


On 23 January 2015 at 12:17, SD Windlesh <sdwindlesh@gmail.com> wrote:
I fully agree with you. The purpose of these debate is something else and not the critical examination of the subject matter.
The anchor want the reply according to the policy of the channel owners and spread the same among the public to mold their thinking.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Brigadier Gopal <brigadiergopal@gmail.com> wrote:
so well said !!

brig h r gopal

On 21 January 2015 at 20:11, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
To

India Against Corruption

                                                                                                      

                                                                    PAIN OF LISTENING TO  ENGLISH NEWS  T V MEDIA  ANCHORS

Obviously, the anchors in English news TV  media who conduct the debates have no in depth knowledge or specialisation in any field. However, they seem to think that they can talk on any subject whether it is economics, politics, science and technology, crime investigation, culture, foreign policy, sports, and what not. It is not an exaggeration to say that their knowledge is half baked , which is there for all to see but these anchors  do not seem to know.

They seem to have a set of people who are called to participate in debates  and they  seem to be available all the time at their beck and call. With many  participants , most of whom are directly or indirectly involved in politics  and not in any way better than the anchors in their  analytical ability, the debate is marked  by lung power rather than substance. The anchor often matches the participants in the lung power, showing  no mercy for the viewers. Certainly, intelligent people with facts and figures, who want to observe decorum ,cannot have their say in full in these debates, which viewers may be eager to listen.

Most of the viewers helplessly watch these debates and keep on changing from one channel to another, wondering whether one channel would be better than the other. This rarely happens.

Fortunately, only a fraction of Indian citizens understand English communication and amongst those who know English, only a small segment have the patience to watch entire debates but the anchors do not care. They seem to whimsically assume that the helpless viewers  will watch anything and everything.

Of course, the worst of the anchors in English  news TV media are  Arnab Goswami and Karan Thapar, who want to dominate the debate and assume that they know everything and exhibit streaks of arrogance and impoliteness. They put questions and when the participants  respond, they cut them and put more questions and shout so much that no one can hear what the participants  say.  These anchors do not seem to realise that they are so uncivilised in their behaviour.
With Indians putting up  with several inconvenience  in day today life, the pain of watching  English TV debates is one more pain that they have to endure .

N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
twitter : @nsvchennai 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
SD Windlesh
Advocate
Ph: 9811169203
Check the group: Hinduism at Stake: 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking:World Bank

Why not some of us get together and make presentation to SC ? This problem of criminal type "judges" will eventually crush the nation itself.

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 1/27/15, Veeresh Malik <veereshmalik@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking:World Bank
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: "capt beniwal" <trident142@yahoo.co.in>, "Pankaj Rai" <raipankaj@yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 9:56 AM


http://swarajyamag.com/columns/how-neta-babu-nexus-crushes-aspiring-sportsmen/

On 27 January 2015 at
11:19, Holiday Bash International <lidder.hbi@gmail.com>
wrote:
WE
are the witness to injustice by High Court Judge . He just
did not hear us Infact on the day of argument he gave his
order before even our lawyer opened his mouth which means it
was pre deceided the judgment .If there was a viedio
clipping it would have been easy for us to prove in SC that
our constitutional right has been violated .

Any
way we will still try getting justice from SC
Amarjit
Pune

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015
at 4:30 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
wrote:
Not only in SC, this kind of thing happens in all
courts. I have witnessed many such frauds by judges. It is
surprising that later many such judges had been promoted or
got post retirel positions. In re- video recording of court
proceedings are concerned there is an international national
commitment from the country and help offered from outside.
ADR may have more information About this. Let some body from
their side explain it. Purposefully our judiciary and
politicians keeps silent about this commitment. If video
recording of every proceedings takes place and a mechanism
is made in place to deal with erring judicial officers, much
problems can easily be solved.
On Jan 26, 2015 3:07
PM, "capt beniwal" <trident142@yahoo.co.in>
wrote:
Sir, I have been
requesting to President and CJI to start live telecast of SC
proceedings. when we can see live how a Law is made in
parliament, then we want to see how that law is applied.
if a lower court commit an error it can
be corrected by higher court but if the SC commit error ,
deliberately or otherwise, it can not be corrected and the
litigant suffer for life. 
i personally saw in SC , when an ex
military men pension case was heard, there was No ASG in
court during hearing but in SC order, came few days
later,  it was stated the ASG made the statement (
thats another point that quoted statement itself is
incorrect misleading)  which became the basis of the
order and that ex  fauji suffer, beside hundreds of
similarly placed men. ASG got the case
settled in chambers.
Had there been recording/live telecast
the two ex-judges would have dared to act dishonestly. soon
after Both got next better appointments.
 
Today is age of e- governance. 
Crores are spend on it.
If there is Rule of Law then Judges
can not be allowed to behave like dictators.
To stop that attitude -   Live
telecast/recording  is the answer.

rgds. beniwal


On Saturday, 24 January 2015
10:21 PM, Pankaj Rai <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
wrote:


 Your Lordship,
As a party in person who
has argued a number of cases in High Court, I fail to
understand two things. Admittedly, the number of Judges in
India is much lower as compared to other countries in the
West. However, what are the reasons whereby the Judiciary is
reluctant in taking action against a litigant if he files
false affidavits and tampered documents even in High Courts?
Why don't High Courts start dismissing cases if people
make dishonest pleadings and award exemplary costs? Will it
not reduce the number of cases significantly if zero
tolerance is shown to fraud? Why are orders not passed on
applications of perjury?
The second question is
whether the existing legal system will inspire confidence
unless the Judiciary is made accountable and there is a
mandatory recording of court proceedings especially in High
Courts/Supreme Courts?
Kind regards,
Pankaj


Maj Pankaj Rai
(Retd),


Cell: +91 99163 57115

On Saturday, 24 January 2015
11:59 AM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com>
wrote:


Dear All,I
do not hold brief for Judges nor I wish to defend the
incompetent Judges.Exceptions are everywhere.I just wish to
bring certain facts,as reported, to the notice of the
readers.It may be known to many.In America on
every 10 Lakh citizens 125 Judges are available where as in
India on 10 Lakh Citizens only 09 Judges are appointed.This
figure shows that insufficiency of judges is
one of the reason for delay in disposal of
cases.           In
2011 the High Court of Bombay notified to fill 100 vacancies
but could fill up only 41.In 2012 out of 159 vacancies only
55 could be filled up.This means even if sanctioned strength
is increased ,desired number of quality officers may not be
available.Still effort is to be made. 
         
D.C.Verma         
  Former Judge

On Thu,
Jan 22, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com>
wrote:
Mr Verma,
Any
increase in the number of judges without enforcing
accountability and transparency will only be wastage of
taxpayers' money. The ground reality is that our
judiciary is a 10000 pc failure by the basic rule that
justice delayed is justice denied. And is justice denied
only through delay? Abs NOT! And why the delay and denial of
justice? Incompetence, ignorance and arrogance of
judges!
Amoung
the three organs of our Constitution the law-makers are
controlled by the people, bureaucracy (yes, bureaucracy,
because without the active support of the bureaucracy no
politician can do any wrong!) and finally the judiciary; the
law-enforcers are also controlled by the law-makers and the
judiciary. And then there are the ears and eyes of the
people- the media waiting to sensationalise every news
involving the misdemeanour of these authorities. Inspite of
such strict supervision and control all that we can hear
these days are about politician-bureaucrat-underworld nexus
even though the fact remains that none, worth the name, from
this unholy nexus have ever been punished by the
holier-than-thou judiciary.
So now think how bad a system can be
which is not only NOT subject to supervision but also kept
beyond critical observation. Well isn't our judiciary
is just that? And do I need to recapitulate that quip: power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts
absolutely?
Please read my blogs:

REFORMING OUR JUSTICE DELIVERY
SYSTEM at http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/2011/02/reforming-our-justice-delivery-system.html
Who will judge the judges?
athttp://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/2011/03/who-will-judge-judges.html
Report of the NCRWC- a Citizens
Review athttp://raviforjustice.blogspot.in/2011/03/report-of-ncrwc-citizens-review.html
Lokpal or not- the judiciary
needs to be disciplined first at http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/2011/05/lokpal-or-not-judiciary-needs-to-be.html
Indian judiciary-who said what
at-http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/2011/05/indian-judiciary-who-said-what.html

Judges! no sermons please
at-http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/2011/06/judges-no-sermons-please.html
ravi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Dinesh
Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com>
wrote:
For reform in judicial system Committee after
Committee were formed but, except few ,in general,
recommendations were not implemented.It is well known
that vacancies, from top court ,ie Supreme Court to lower
subordinate courts ,are not filled up.Cases are piling
up.           
   Sanctioned strength of Judges is
proportionately  insufficient for the cases already
pending or to meet the new institutions.Even sanctioned
strength is not filled up.This also leads to delay in
decision.         
      Increase in legislation ,increase in
population,increase in peoples awareness for their
rights,increase in strikes by members of the Bar,increase in
seeking adjournments on various avoidable grounds are other
reasons for increase in litigation.   
            The sanctioned
strength of Judges at all the levels is desired to be
increased by four times with simultaneous increase in
infrastructure.         
      It is for the authorities & for
policy makers to consider and take an early
action.D.C.VermaFormer
Judge           
    
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Dipak
Shah <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
wrote:
I
can give you
as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they are rattled by
Justices .
Are they taking oath for such doing business. Without having
filed
Affidavit in reply by Respondents , having served the
notice, dismissed
the cases taking own intuition of the subject
matter.!!!!!Relevance of the cases not
related to the case under study!!!!Recently
Gujarat High Court has made a rule that Party In Person
cannot appear
in his case unless Special Committee takes interview and
passes him to
appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise he has
to engage
Advocate in his case. This is against fundamental rights of
a person
under Constitution.
I
had seen one Advocate of one Justice loitering in the courts
to canvass for doing favorable judgment !!!!In
one case Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made
order immediately
after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues office by
Manmoihan
Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I Office was afraud and
cash
counter to Grant hefty premiums over the share public
issue.
Since
the office is abolished the petition is dismissed. No
Affidavit filed
by Controller of Capital Issues!!! How the flow of water
gate flows!!!!
To fight with this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India
by spending
lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely.
Attached Document, See also relevance of the names and
Google Search all and every thing.How the Cases are being handled. There is no
supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you
die.Shah D J



On Wednesday, 21 January 2015
8:25 AM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
wrote:



I
can give you as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they
are rattled by Justices . Are they taking oath for such
doing business. Without having filed Affidavit in reply by
Respondents , having served the notice, dismissed the cases
taking own intuition of the subject matter.!!!!!Relevance of the cases not related to the case
under study!!!!Recently Gujarat High
Court has made a rule that Party In Person cannot appear in
his case unless Special Committee takes interview and passes
him to appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise
he has to engage Advocate in his case. This is against
fundamental rights of a person under Constitution.
I had seen one Advocate of
one Justice loitering in the courts to canvass for doing
favorable judgment !!!!In one case
Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made order
immediately after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues
office by Manmoihan Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I
Office was afraud and cash counter to Grant hefty premiums
over the share public issue.
Since the office is abolished the petition is
dismissed. No Affidavit filed by Controller of Capital
Issues!!! How the flow of water gate flows!!!! To fight with
this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India by spending
lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely.
Attached Documents, See also relevance of the names and
Google Search all and every thing.How the Cases are being handled. There is no
supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you
die.Shah D J


On Wednesday, 21 January 2015
1:07 AM, Manohar Sharma <mspropertyresource@gmail.com>
wrote:



I and in my circle has EXPERIENCED how petitions r
NEGLECTED and time PASSED to get DEATH of CAUSE of PETITIONS
4 example one see WP @ M-HC/8508/2003.  
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:46 AM, sonico
sharma sharma <sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com>
wrote:






This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com)

Add
cleanup rule
| More
info









sir,
justice delayed is
justice denied

Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:51:50
+0530
From: janhitmanch@gmail.com
To:
Subject: [IAC#RG] Court
pendency behind India's low global ranking: World
Bank



Date
: 17-01-2015



SPEED
POST




BHAGVANJI
RAIYANI



I
AM ASHAMED OF OUR JUDICIARY

I
AM ASHAMED OF OUR GOVERNMENT

I
AM ASHAMED OF OUR PARLIAMENT




To,
1.
Hon'ble Shri Pranab Mukherjee
The
President of India,
2.
Dr.Hamid Ansari
Hon'ble
Vice President of India,
3.
Mrs.Sumitra Mahajan
Hon'ble
Speaker, Loksabha
4.
Hon'ble Shri Narendra Modi,
The
Prime Minister of India
5.
Hon'ble Justice H.L.Dattu
The
Chief Justice of India
6.
Hon'ble Smt.Sushma Swaraj
Minister
for External Affair
7.
Hon'ble Shri D.V.Sadananda Gowda
Minister
for Law & Justice



Please
read The Times of India report dated 17-1-2015 as hereunder,
captioned 'Court pendency behind India's low global
ranking: World
Bank finding: 'Ease of Doing Business'. India was
ranked 142 among
189 countries last year. The World Bank suggested that there
was an
urgent need for reforms in the system of performance
appraisal of
judicial reforms.



We
go on urging for your appointments to discuss judicial
reforms but
you never care to reply. Now we will be more aggressive
(Gandhian
ways) an pursuing the mission justice. We will take the
issue before
the UN and the comity of nations.



I
dare you all to sue me if you feel I have defamed
institutions or the
dignitaries.



(Bhagvanji
Raiyani)

Chairman
& Managing Trustee

Forum
For Fast Justice

09820403912
Kuber
Bhuvan, Bajaj Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai – 400
056.

The
Times of India report:
Court
pendency behind India's low global ranking: World
Bank.




NEW DELHI: Large pendency of
cases in Indian courts and non-implementation of judicial
reforms
have been cited by the World Bank as one of the key reasons
for
India's low rank on the Bank's Index of 'Ease of
Doing Business'.
India was ranked 142 among 189 countries last
year.


In a
memorandum to the
department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) under
the
commerce ministry, the World Bank suggested linking
judges' appraisal
with reduction of pendency in courts. Sources said the
matter was
discussed at a meeting organized by the DIPP recently to
refine the
performance evaluation system of judges to link their
performance to
the resolution of specific bottlenecks as suggested by the
World
Bank.


The DIPP is
also
coordinating implementation of the 'Make in India'
campaign of the
Modi government.


Interestingly,
the
World Bank suggested that there was an urgent need for
reforms in the
system of performance appraisal of judicial officers in the
country
to bring about uniformity and infuse objectivity and
standardization.


The Bank cited
an
example from Malaysia where implementation of a reform index
for
judges improved case disposal rates and reduced backlog by
50% in
less than three years. Another example was cited from the
United Arab
Emirates, where rewards were instituted for the best
performers.


According to
the
memorandum, the liberal grant of adjournments was an often
cited
reason for delays in court proceedings in India. It
recommended
monitoring the number of times judges granted adjournments
and the
reasons for granting them. "This can be done through
case
management systems and linked to performance management
evaluations,"
it said.


It asked the
government
to ensure that adjournments were not indefinite by setting a
time
limit.


Just a few
weeks ago,
the Modi government had written to chief justices of all 24
high
courts to ensure speedier settlement of commercial and other
disputes
for creating a conducive investment climate and success of
'Make in
India' campaign.


"One of
the
reforms introduced by Malaysia between 2009 and 2011 during
the
overhaul of the judicial system was the implementation of a
reform
index for judges," the Bank said, citing how this
index, fixed
by the judges themselves, was aimed at allowing them to
assess and
monitor their performance. As a result of this and other
measures,
case disposal rates in Malaysian courts improved and backlog
was
reduced by 50% in less than three years, it
said. 


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in






Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M
Ravindran
http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 
http://www.judicialreforms.org/
http://www.roguepolice.com
http://milapchoraria.tripod.com


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit:

Re: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking:World Bank

Can anyone tell me with whom I should seek permission to record a district judge courtroom?

I have a case pending so for sake of shaming the judiciary, I would like to record and YouTube this video.

Regards
Hemant Kshirsagar

On Jan 30, 2015 5:26 PM, "Veeresh Malik" <veereshmalik@gmail.com> wrote:

On 27 January 2015 at 11:19, Holiday Bash International <lidder.hbi@gmail.com> wrote:
WE are the witness to injustice by High Court Judge . He just did not hear us Infact on the day of argument he gave his order before even our lawyer opened his mouth which means it was pre deceided the judgment .If there was a viedio clipping it would have been easy for us to prove in SC that our constitutional right has been violated .

Any way we will still try getting justice from SC
Amarjit
Pune

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:30 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:

Not only in SC, this kind of thing happens in all courts. I have witnessed many such frauds by judges. It is surprising that later many such judges had been promoted or got post retirel positions. In re- video recording of court proceedings are concerned there is an international national commitment from the country and help offered from outside. ADR may have more information About this. Let some body from their side explain it. Purposefully our judiciary and politicians keeps silent about this commitment. If video recording of every proceedings takes place and a mechanism is made in place to deal with erring judicial officers, much problems can easily be solved.

On Jan 26, 2015 3:07 PM, "capt beniwal" <trident142@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Sir, I have been requesting to President and CJI to start live telecast of SC proceedings. when we can see live how a Law is made in parliament, then we want to see how that law is applied.
if a lower court commit an error it can be corrected by higher court but if the SC commit error , deliberately or otherwise, it can not be corrected and the litigant suffer for life. 

i personally saw in SC , when an ex military men pension case was heard, there was No ASG in court during hearing but in SC order, came few days later,  it was stated the ASG made the statement ( thats another point that quoted statement itself is incorrect misleading)  which became the basis of the order and that ex  fauji suffer, beside hundreds of similarly placed men.
ASG got the case settled in chambers.
Had there been recording/live telecast the two ex-judges would have dared to act dishonestly. soon after Both got next better appointments.
 
Today is age of e- governance.  Crores are spend on it.
If there is Rule of Law then Judges can not be allowed to behave like dictators.
To stop that attitude -   Live telecast/recording  is the answer.

rgds. beniwal


On Saturday, 24 January 2015 10:21 PM, Pankaj Rai <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:


 Your Lordship,

As a party in person who has argued a number of cases in High Court, I fail to understand two things. Admittedly, the number of Judges in India is much lower as compared to other countries in the West. However, what are the reasons whereby the Judiciary is reluctant in taking action against a litigant if he files false affidavits and tampered documents even in High Courts? Why don't High Courts start dismissing cases if people make dishonest pleadings and award exemplary costs? Will it not reduce the number of cases significantly if zero tolerance is shown to fraud? Why are orders not passed on applications of perjury?

The second question is whether the existing legal system will inspire confidence unless the Judiciary is made accountable and there is a mandatory recording of court proceedings especially in High Courts/Supreme Courts?

Kind regards,

Pankaj


Maj Pankaj Rai (Retd),


Cell: +91 99163 57115


On Saturday, 24 January 2015 11:59 AM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear All,
I do not hold brief for Judges nor I wish to defend the incompetent Judges.Exceptions are everywhere.I just wish to bring certain facts,as reported, to the notice of the readers.It may be known to many.
In America on every 10 Lakh citizens 125 Judges are available where as in India on 10 Lakh Citizens only 09 Judges are appointed.This figure shows that 
insufficiency of judges is one of the reason for delay in disposal of cases.
           In 2011 the High Court of Bombay notified to fill 100 vacancies but could fill up only 41.In 2012 out of 159 vacancies only 55 could be filled up.This means even if sanctioned strength is increased ,desired number of quality officers may not be available.Still effort is to be made.
            D.C.Verma
            Former Judge


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Verma,

Any increase in the number of judges without enforcing accountability and transparency will only be wastage of taxpayers' money. The ground reality is that our judiciary is a 10000 pc failure by the basic rule that justice delayed is justice denied. And is justice denied only through delay? Abs NOT! And why the delay and denial of justice? Incompetence, ignorance and arrogance of judges!

Amoung the three organs of our Constitution the law-makers are controlled by the people, bureaucracy (yes, bureaucracy, because without the active support of the bureaucracy no politician can do any wrong!) and finally the judiciary; the law-enforcers are also controlled by the law-makers and the judiciary. And then there are the ears and eyes of the people- the media waiting to sensationalise every news involving the misdemeanour of these authorities. Inspite of such strict supervision and control all that we can hear these days are about politician-bureaucrat-underworld nexus even though the fact remains that none, worth the name, from this unholy nexus have ever been punished by the holier-than-thou judiciary.

So now think how bad a system can be which is not only NOT subject to supervision but also kept beyond critical observation. Well isn't our judiciary is just that? And do I need to recapitulate that quip: power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely?

Please read my blogs:




Lokpal or not- the judiciary needs to be disciplined first at 




ravi

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com> wrote:
For reform in judicial system Committee after Committee were formed but, except few ,in general, recommendations were not implemented.
It is well known that vacancies, from top court ,ie Supreme Court to lower subordinate courts ,are not filled up.Cases are piling up.
               Sanctioned strength of Judges is proportionately  insufficient for the cases already pending or to meet the new institutions.Even sanctioned strength is not filled up.This also leads to delay in decision.
                Increase in legislation ,increase in population,increase in peoples awareness for their rights,increase in strikes by members of the Bar,increase in seeking adjournments on various avoidable grounds are other reasons for increase in litigation.
                The sanctioned strength of Judges at all the levels is desired to be increased by four times with simultaneous increase in infrastructure.
                It is for the authorities & for policy makers to consider and take an early action.
D.C.Verma
Former Judge
                

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Dipak Shah <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
I can give you as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they are rattled by Justices . Are they taking oath for such doing business. Without having filed Affidavit in reply by Respondents , having served the notice, dismissed the cases taking own intuition of the subject matter.!!!!!
Relevance of the cases not related to the case under study!!!!
Recently Gujarat High Court has made a rule that Party In Person cannot appear in his case unless Special Committee takes interview and passes him to appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise he has to engage Advocate in his case. This is against fundamental rights of a person under Constitution.
I had seen one Advocate of one Justice loitering in the courts to canvass for doing favorable judgment !!!!
In one case Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made order immediately after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues office by Manmoihan Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I Office was afraud and cash counter to Grant hefty premiums over the share public issue.
Since the office is abolished the petition is dismissed. No Affidavit filed by Controller of Capital Issues!!! How the flow of water gate flows!!!! To fight with this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India by spending lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely. Attached Document, See also relevance of the names and Google Search all and every thing.
How the Cases are being handled. There is no supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you die.
Shah D J



On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 8:25 AM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:


I can give you as many as more than 20 of my cases. How they are rattled by Justices . Are they taking oath for such doing business. Without having filed Affidavit in reply by Respondents , having served the notice, dismissed the cases taking own intuition of the subject matter.!!!!!
Relevance of the cases not related to the case under study!!!!
Recently Gujarat High Court has made a rule that Party In Person cannot appear in his case unless Special Committee takes interview and passes him to appear and competent to appear in the case. Otherwise he has to engage Advocate in his case. This is against fundamental rights of a person under Constitution.
I had seen one Advocate of one Justice loitering in the courts to canvass for doing favorable judgment !!!!
In one case Justice G T  Nanavati and other Justice made order immediately after abolition of Controller of Capital Issues office by Manmoihan Singh in Fianance Bill. in 1992. C C I Office was afraud and cash counter to Grant hefty premiums over the share public issue.
Since the office is abolished the petition is dismissed. No Affidavit filed by Controller of Capital Issues!!! How the flow of water gate flows!!!! To fight with this I had to appeal to Supreme Court of India by spending lacs of rupees!!!!
One case may be seen , very minutely. Attached Documents, See also relevance of the names and Google Search all and every thing.
How the Cases are being handled. There is no supervisor !! Appeal and Appeal and Appeal till you die.
Shah D J


On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 1:07 AM, Manohar Sharma <mspropertyresource@gmail.com> wrote:


I and in my circle has EXPERIENCED how petitions r NEGLECTED and time PASSED to get DEATH of CAUSE of PETITIONS 4 example one see WP @ M-HC/8508/2003.  

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:46 AM, sonico sharma sharma <sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (sharmakrishna27@hotmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

sir,
justice delayed is justice denied


Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:51:50 +0530
From: janhitmanch@gmail.com
To:
Subject: [IAC#RG] Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank



Date : 17-01-2015

SPEED POST

BHAGVANJI RAIYANI

I AM ASHAMED OF OUR JUDICIARY
I AM ASHAMED OF OUR GOVERNMENT
I AM ASHAMED OF OUR PARLIAMENT

To,
1. Hon'ble Shri Pranab Mukherjee
The President of India,
2. Dr.Hamid Ansari
Hon'ble Vice President of India,
3. Mrs.Sumitra Mahajan
Hon'ble Speaker, Loksabha
4. Hon'ble Shri Narendra Modi,
The Prime Minister of India
5. Hon'ble Justice H.L.Dattu
The Chief Justice of India
6. Hon'ble Smt.Sushma Swaraj
Minister for External Affair
7. Hon'ble Shri D.V.Sadananda Gowda
Minister for Law & Justice

Please read The Times of India report dated 17-1-2015 as hereunder, captioned 'Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank finding: 'Ease of Doing Business'. India was ranked 142 among 189 countries last year. The World Bank suggested that there was an urgent need for reforms in the system of performance appraisal of judicial reforms.

We go on urging for your appointments to discuss judicial reforms but you never care to reply. Now we will be more aggressive (Gandhian ways) an pursuing the mission justice. We will take the issue before the UN and the comity of nations.

I dare you all to sue me if you feel I have defamed institutions or the dignitaries.

(Bhagvanji Raiyani)
Chairman & Managing Trustee
Forum For Fast Justice
09820403912
Kuber Bhuvan, Bajaj Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai – 400 056.
The Times of India report:
Court pendency behind India's low global ranking: World Bank.

NEW DELHI: Large pendency of cases in Indian courts and non-implementation of judicial reforms have been cited by the World Bank as one of the key reasons for India's low rank on the Bank's Index of 'Ease of Doing Business'. India was ranked 142 among 189 countries last year.

In a memorandum to the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) under the commerce ministry, the World Bank suggested linking judges' appraisal with reduction of pendency in courts. Sources said the matter was discussed at a meeting organized by the DIPP recently to refine the performance evaluation system of judges to link their performance to the resolution of specific bottlenecks as suggested by the World Bank.

The DIPP is also coordinating implementation of the 'Make in India' campaign of the Modi government.

Interestingly, the World Bank suggested that there was an urgent need for reforms in the system of performance appraisal of judicial officers in the country to bring about uniformity and infuse objectivity and standardization.

The Bank cited an example from Malaysia where implementation of a reform index for judges improved case disposal rates and reduced backlog by 50% in less than three years. Another example was cited from the United Arab Emirates, where rewards were instituted for the best performers.

According to the memorandum, the liberal grant of adjournments was an often cited reason for delays in court proceedings in India. It recommended monitoring the number of times judges granted adjournments and the reasons for granting them. "This can be done through case management systems and linked to performance management evaluations," it said.

It asked the government to ensure that adjournments were not indefinite by setting a time limit.

Just a few weeks ago, the Modi government had written to chief justices of all 24 high courts to ensure speedier settlement of commercial and other disputes for creating a conducive investment climate and success of 'Make in India' campaign.

"One of the reforms introduced by Malaysia between 2009 and 2011 during the overhaul of the judicial system was the implementation of a reform index for judges," the Bank said, citing how this index, fixed by the judges themselves, was aimed at allowing them to assess and monitor their performance. As a result of this and other measures, case disposal rates in Malaysian courts improved and backlog was reduced by 50% in less than three years, it said. 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Holiday Bash International.
Pune, India
Tel  : +91-20-66015020
Fax : +91-20-26055158
Mob : +91-9423582779; 9823012276
http://holidaybash.net
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Holiday-Bash-International/114429708650682
Alternate E-mail : contact@holidaybash.net
Inline image 1

Enjoy a Unique Travel Experience With Us


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in